查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 孫中山與馬克思平等理論之比較研究=The Comparative Study of Theory of Equality between Sun Yat-sen and Karl Marx |
---|---|
作 者 | 林賢治; | 書刊名 | 逢甲人文社會學報 |
卷期 | 2 2001.05[民90.05] |
頁次 | 頁259-275 |
分類號 | 549.4、549.4 |
關鍵詞 | 天生的不平等; 人為的不平等; 資產階級法權; 無產階級專政; 各盡所能各取所需; Inequality of nature; Inequality of man made; Right of the bourgeoisie; Dictatorship of the proletariat; Everyone doing his best; Everyone taking his needs; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文首先簡短地回顧西方有關人類平等問題的探討,並指出孫中山與馬克思的平等思想受西方十七、十八世紀古典自然法學派平等思想的影響,且對古典自然法學派的平等思想提出有力的批評,從而發展出一家之言的平等理論。 關於孫中山的平等理論,作者從「不平等與假平等」、「平等的真諦──真平等」等二個方面論說孫中山的平等理論,並認為孫中山的平等理論是一個創新的平等理論。其次,再從「對資產階級平等的批判」、「平等思想與工人階級運動」和「共產主義社會有平等思想嗎?」等三個方面來探究馬克思的平等思想,從而結論指出,馬克思所構思的共產主義社會,是不需要平等思想的。最後,以「關於平等理論的哲學基礎」、「關於平等理論的目標」、「關於平等的需求」和「關於平等理論的思想地位」等四個主題來比較研究孫中山與馬克思的平等理論。 由前述的論說和比較,作者在結論裡強調,孫中山的平等思想是具體的、踏實的,其目的是要建立一個新國家。相反的,馬克思的平等思想主要在批判任何形式的平等思想,並擬想一個不需要任何形式平等思想的共產主義社會。 |
英文摘要 | Firstly, this paper states the western theories of human equality briefly, and points out that the thoughts of equality of Sun Yat-Sen and Karl Marx had been influenced by the thoughts of equality of classical natural law in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, and had developed their own theory of equality finally. Concerning the theory of equality of Sun Yat-Sen , the author explores it from two aspects of “ Inequality and False Equality ” and “ True Meaning of Equality── Real Equality ” , and argues that Sun Yat-Sen’s theory of equality is a new theory of equality . Secondly, the author explores Marx’s theory of equality from three aspects of “ Criticism of Bourgeois Equality ”, “ Thought of Equality and Movement of Working Class ”, and “ Is There the Theory of Equality in Communist Society ?”, and conclusively points out that thought of equality is unnecessary for communist society visualized by Marx. Lastly, the author compares two theories of equality from four topics of “ Philosophical Foundation of Theory of Equality ”, “ Goal of Theory of Equality ”, “ Necessity of Equality ” and “ Theory of Equality in Thought System ” . According to the discussion and comparison mentioned above, in conclusion, the author emphasizes that Sun Yat-Sen’s theory of equality is concrete and practical, and it’s aim is to build a new country .On the contrary, the aim of Marx’s theory of equality is to criticize the thought of equality in any form, and to visualize a communist society for which the thought of equality in any form is unnecessary. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。