查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Rationing Emission Rights for Air Pollution Control: Fairness, Advantages and Implementability
- 臺灣創設罷工預告制度之論辯--美國勞資爭議處理機制和理念之啟示
- 《荀子》與《呂氏春秋》的「公」概念
- 《荀子》與《呂氏春秋》的「公」概念
- 論經營判斷法則之實務見解
- 臺灣創設罷工預告制度之論辯--美國勞資爭議處理機制和理念之啟示
- Fairness Guaranteed Rating Decomposition in Service-oriented Reputation Systems
- Fairness Guaranteed Rating Decomposition in Service-oriented Reputation Systems
- 論經營判斷法則之實務見解
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Rationing Emission Rights for Air Pollution Control: Fairness, Advantages and Implementability= |
---|---|
作者 | Lu, Alan Yun; Lu, Alan Yun; |
期刊 | 農業與經濟 |
出版日期 | 19910600 |
卷期 | 12 1991.06[民80.06] |
頁次 | 頁95-109 |
分類號 | 431.9 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | Rationing emission right; Air pollution control; Fairness; Advantages; Implementability; |
英文摘要 | Various methods have been proposed and applied to solve air pollution problem (e.g., Crendall (1986), Enviromental Protection Administration (1988, 1989), Friedlaender (1978), National Commission on Air Quality (1981), OECD (1980), Portney (1984), White (1986)). In terms of efficiencies in control costs and resource allocation and thus maximization of total social welfare, emission fees and marketable (tradable) emission (discharge) petmits are the two preferred methods among economists. Study and comparison of these two methods also became the interests of many researchers (e.g., Baumol (1988), Bohm (1985), Hahn (1987)). It seems that the consensus is that, among other advantages over emission fees, marketable emission permits 'promise to reduce the unceratinty and adjustment costs involved in attaining legally required levels of environmental quality' (Baumol, 1988, p.178). |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。