查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 安寧病房健保給付制度改變前後抗生素使用之比較
- 安寧療護病患抗生素使用之探討
- 癌末病患常見心理狀態與照顧
- 臺灣四大族群癌末病患接受安寧療護型態之比較--以花蓮縣某醫學中心為例
- 如何介入癌末病患與潛在精神疾病家屬之互動關係
- 安寧療護生命最後一周的抗生素使用概況分析
- 安寧療護癌末病人是否需要抗生素治療
- 南部某醫學中心安寧療護的抗生素使用分析
- 安寧療護在臺灣
- Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Klebsiella Pneumoniae Isolates Resistant to Extended-Spectrum β-Lactam Antibiotics
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 安寧病房健保給付制度改變前後抗生素使用之比較=The Comparison of Antibiotics Prescription in Hospice Care Unit after Payment System Changes |
---|---|
作 者 | 周裕清; 陳亮恭; 林玉茹; 黃信彰; 陳振文; 吳彬源; 林明慧; 蔡世滋; | 書刊名 | 臺灣家庭醫學雜誌 |
卷 期 | 11:1 2001.03[民90.03] |
頁 次 | 頁33-39 |
分類號 | 419.77、419.77 |
關鍵詞 | 健保給付制度; 抗生素; 癌末病患; 安寧療護; Antibiotics; Palliative care; Payment system; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 對於癌末病患的感染症,臨床醫師在評估病患情況決定是否使用抗生素治療時必須從很多方面思考。由於醫療費用給付制度對醫療行為及醫療資源之配置影響甚鉅,安寧療護是否亦會受到醫療費用給付制度的改變,而影響醫療決策的倫理觀,值得關注。財務因素是否會影響安寧療護醫師開立抗生素的行為模式是本研究所要探討的主要目的。本文以國內某醫學中心的安寧病房住院病患為對象,回溯性調查481位癌末病患於535次住院期間之抗生素使用狀況;並分析民國八十九年七月健保申報改採論日計酬制度前後,財務因素對於醫師開立抗生素的影響。結果從民國八十八年七月一日起至九十年六月三十日止,住院過程中使用過抗生素治療274次(51.2%),其中有108次(39.4%)開立僅出自臨床判斷,此外有87次(31.8%)為接續先前轉至安寧病房前之抗生素治療,79次(28.8%)在病患出現高燒後開立抗生素。分組比較八十八與八十九年度兩年之間醫師開立抗生素的處方案例,無論是採用臨床判斷而開立者、或者延續先前病房所使用的抗生素,在統計上並無明顯的差異(p=0.660, p=0.431)。考量營運指標重新校正分析之後,兩者在統計上也沒有明顯的差異(p=0.917, p=0.673)。顯示該醫學中心的安寧病房抗生素的開立不會因為健保給付制度的改變,而傾向不予抗生素治療或開立較便宜的口服抗生素或第一線靜脈注射抗生素,醫師臨床的專業判斷仍是主要的依據。 |
英文摘要 | It takes a great amount of medical causal reasoning for physicians to prescribe antibiotics for terminal cancer patients in a potential infectious circumstance. Because the payment system reimbursed by National Insurance Bureau tremendously affects the allocation of medical practice and health service resources, it is worthy of note that whether the changes of payment system will affect the ethics in decision-making of palliative care service as well. The research was conducted to explore how it impacts physicians on their prescription of antibiotics for the terminal cancer patients. We retrospectively studied the prescription patterns among 535 admissions of 481 patients in a hospice and palliative care unit in a medical center in Taiwan from July 1, 1999 to June 30, 2001. We also analyzed the impacts to physicians' prescriptions of antibiotics when payment system was superseded by per diem basis started from July 1, 2000. There were 274 (51.2%) antibiotics prescriptions, including 108 new prescriptions based on clinical diagonsis, 87 (31.8%) prescriptions repeating previous physician's orders, and 79 (28.8%) prescriptions made for high fever. We compared the prescriptions made on-site based on clinical diagnosis with those prescriptions repeating previous physicians' orders. No differences were identified between the two groups with regard to the changes of payment systems (p=0.660, p=0.431), even after factor adjustment to financial index (p=0.917, p=0.673). We concluded that the changes of payment system do not affect physicians to prescribe antibiotics in the hospice and palliative care unit, and the professional judgment remains the guidelines for decision-making. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。