頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 經濟理論中的廠商=The Firm in Economic Theoy |
---|---|
作者 | 何宇明; | 書刊名 | 高雄應用科技大學學報 |
卷期 | 31 2001.12[民90.12] |
頁次 | 頁315-327 |
分類號 | 550.189 |
關鍵詞 | 廠商; 經濟選擇的邏輯; 抽象科學的經濟模型; 預測科學之經濟行為; 行為科學的經濟行為; Firm; The logic of economic choice; The abstract science of economic behavior; The predictive science of economic behavior; The behavioristic science of the economy; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文的目的在於釐清新古典學派(neoclassical school)、新制度經濟學(new institutional economics)及新興制度經濟學(neo-institutional economics)之廠商理論的爭論與混淆。透過本文的分析,我們發現新古典學派係在抽象科學的經濟模型之範疇討論廠商,新制度學派係在經濟選擇的羅輯(將交易成本視為行為人內在的主觀評值)或抽象科學的經濟模型(將交易成本視為外在客觀的可衡量之數值)的範疇內對廠商加以論述,而新興制度學派的學者則分別從預測科學之經濟行為的範疇及行為科學的經濟行學範疇解釋廠商的產生和成長,由此我們可看出各種學派的廠商理論之所以不同,乃是他們以不同的範疇論述廠商之故。 |
英文摘要 | The aim of this paper is to clear the confusions of the theory of the firm among neoclassical school, new-institutional economics and neo-institutional economics. The major findings of this study is that the theory of the firm in neoclassical schools is belong to the category of the abstract science of economic behavior, the theory of the firm in new-institutional economics is developed in the category of the logic of economic choice (treat transaction cost as subjective evaluations) or the abstract science of economic behavior (treat transaction cost as objective measurable cost), and the theory of the firm in neo-institutional economics is included in the category of the predictive science of economic behavior and the behavioristic science of the economy. In short, the main reason of the confusions in the theory of firm among different schools is due to categorical distinctions. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。