查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 原住民與非原住民學童的認知風格、推理表現與問題解決表現之相關研究--以桃園縣平地國小學童為例
- 國小學童的認知風格差異及其推理與問題解決表現之關係研究--以就讀桃園縣平地國小之原住民與非原住民學童為例
- 認知風格與創新
- A Study of an Inquiry-based Learning Approach on College Students' Online Problem-solving Abilities
- 隱喻的意義及其在學校行政問題解決的應用
- 社區警政與問題導向之關係
- 認知風格、認知策略、遺傳學知識與遺傳學解題之研究
- 以問題解決為導向的教學理念與模式
- Parameterized 2D Graphic Compositions
- A Study on the Application of Computers in Basic Graphic Design Course using the Hyper Talk Scripting Language
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 國小學童的認知風格差異及其推理與問題解決表現之關係研究--以就讀桃園縣平地國小之原住民與非原住民學童為例=The Study of the Relationship among Cognitive Style, Reasoning Performance and Daily-Life Problem-solving Performance in between Aboriginal and Non-Aboriginal Elementary Students--An Example in Regular Elementary Schools in Tauyen |
---|---|
作 者 | 高淑芳; 林麗惠; | 書刊名 | 新竹師院學報 |
卷 期 | 14 2001.02[民90.02] |
頁 次 | 頁87-126 |
分類號 | 523.3 |
關鍵詞 | 原住民國小學童; 認知風格; 瑞文式標準圖形推理測驗; 問題解決; Aborigine elementary student; Reasoning performance; Cognitive style; Problem-solving; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究旨在探討原住民與非原住民籍國小六年級男女學童的主要認知風格、推理表現與問題解決表現是否有顯著的不同;又,不同族籍別的男女國小學童的推理表現與問題解決表現,是否會依學童的主要認知風格的差異而有所不同,另外,其認知風格、推理表現與問題解決表現之間的相關情形為何?本研究以桃園縣平地國小六年級原住民與非原住民學童為研究對象,第一階段以393名有效樣本進行「團體嵌圖測驗」及「瑞文式標準圖形推理測驗」來了解受試學童的認知風格類型與推理表現的差異情形,第二階段在經過性別、族籍別、認知風格、時間作業情境的平衡配對後,以120名受試樣本進行研究者自編之「問題解決測驗」。研究資料以相關分析、多元逐步迴歸分析、變異數分析、共變數分析等方法來進行,研究結果發現: 1、問題解決能力與認知風格間的關係似乎較其與推理能力間的關係還要密切。 2、認知風格的型態並無發現有性別差異存在,但原住民籍與非原住民籍受試學童在認知風格傾向上卻呈現顯著的不同-原住民籍受試學童傾向場地依賴的認知風格類型,而非原住民籍學童較傾向場地獨立型的認知風格類型。 3、在未考慮認知風格因素的影響下,非原住民籍受試學童在「瑞文式標準圖形推理測驗」上的推理表現顯著優於原住民籍受試學童的表現;但,加以考慮認知風格因素的影響後,則族籍別間未有顯著差異。 4、不論性別、族籍別為何場地獨立型受試學童的推理表現、問題解決表現均顯著優於場地依賴型受試學童。 最後依此研究發現提出討論與建議,以做為教學及未來進一步研究之參考。 |
英文摘要 | The main purpose of this study is to investigate possible differences between aboriginal and non-aboriginal elementary students in cognitive styles, reasoning performance, and darly-life problem-solving performance. This study is also designed to explore the relationship among cognitive styles, reasoning performance, and daily-life problem-solving performance, and to examine if the performances of rsasoning and daily-life problem solving being a function of cognitive styles. The subjects of this study were aboriginal and non-aboriginal sixth-grades students of regular elementary schools in Tauyen. In the first stage of this study, 393 subjects were asked to perform the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) and Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM) to understand their cognitive styles and reasoning performance. In the second stage, 120 out of 393 students in the first stage took a daily-life problem-solving test after counterbalance in sex, races, cognitive styles, and time conditions of the cognitive style task. The data were analyzed by correlation, multiple regression analysis, 3-way ANOVA, and 3-way ANCOVA. The main findings of this study are as follows: 1.The correlation between problem-solving ability and cognitive style is stronger than that between problem-solving ability and reasoning ability. 2.No sex difference was found in cognitive styles. Yet, Different cognitive style tendencies were found in aboriginal students compared to non-aboriginal students, in which more aboriginal students were categorized as a field-dependence cognitive style and more non-aboriginal students were categorized as a field-independence cognitive style. 3.Without considering the influence of cognitive style, non-aboriginal students performed better than aboriginal students in SPM. Yet, undertaking the influence of cognitive style, no race difference was found. 4.No matter what sex and race is, the field-independence cognitive style students performed better than field-dependence cognitive style students SPM and GEFT. Finally, according to the results, further instructions and suggestions for future research were addressed. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。