頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 淺基礎彈性沉陷量之分析方法=Methods for Predicting Elastic Settlement of Shallow Foundations |
---|---|
作 者 | 熊雲嵋; | 書刊名 | 中國土木水利工程學刊 |
卷 期 | 10:3 1998.09[民87.09] |
頁 次 | 頁429-437 |
分類號 | 441.153 |
關鍵詞 | 彈性沉陷量; 土壤彈性係數; 淺基礎; 土壤N值; Elastic settlement; Elastic modulus of soil; Shallow foundation; N-value; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文目的為探討基礎彈性沉陷量的分析方法。 選擇經常被使用的五種方法,以 彈性理論方法為基準進行比較, 從分析比較發現:Meyerhof 方法計算值最大,Burland 方 法計算值最小。就分析方法適用性而言,Schmertmann 方法最高,Schmertmann 方法可以取 代 Janbu 方法,Burland 方法幾乎涵蓋 Meyerhof 方法。Schmertmann 方法與 burland 方 法分別為理論方法與經驗方法之代表,雖然兩種方法計算值相差並不大但計算式含意不同, 計算顯式示基礎寬度、土壤勁度 (土壤 N 值,土壤彈性係數 ) 對沉陷量貢獻不同。不論那 種方法,土壤彈性係數或土壤彈性指標 (N 值 ) 均為沉陷量計算正確性主要控制因素。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this paper is to study the methods for predicting the elastic settlements of shallow foundations. On the basis of elasticity, it was found that Meyerhof's method yields the highest settlement, and Burland's method the lowest. Schmertmann's method has the highest suitability, but the calculated settlement is on the safe side. Janbu's method can be replaced by Schmertmann's method, while Burland's method can almost cover Meyerhof's method. Schmertmann's method and Burland's method can be regarded as a typical analytical and empirical method, respectively, which are based on different methodologies. The major factor affecting the applicability of the aforementioned methods is the elastic modulus or the N value. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。