頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Duverger's Hypothesis Revisited=杜弗傑假設的再檢視與修正 |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 吳文程; | 書刊名 | 東吳政治學報 |
卷期 | 12 2001.03[民90.03] |
頁次 | 頁41-73 |
分類號 | 574.4236 |
關鍵詞 | 杜弗傑定律; 杜弗傑假設; 溫和多黨制; 極端多黨制; 向心競爭; 離心競爭; Duverger's law; Duverger's hypothesis; Polarized multi-party system; Moderate multi-party system; Centrifugal competition; Centripetal competition; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 自從杜弗傑提出其著名的「杜弗傑假設」:絕對多數兩輪投票制與比例 代表制促成多黨制,五十多年來沒有人認真嚴肅地加以批判與修正。沒有人真正 問過這個問題:為什們兩種截然不同的選舉制度會導致相同的政黨體系?杜弗傑 假設的問題主要是出在他對政黨體制的分類,因為他未將兩種極為不同的多黨制 分開,因此他看不到兩種不同選舉制度所造成的不同政治效果。這篇論文試圖對 杜弗傑的類型概念(一黨制、二黨制、多黨制)做深入的批判,並將杜弗傑假設 修正為(一)絕對多數兩輪投票制傾向溫和多黨制;(二)比例代表制傾向極端 多黨制。本論文以法國第四共和與第五共和之比較為例,來驗證此一修正。 |
英文摘要 | Since Maurice Duverger formulated his famous hypothesis that the majority system with second-ballot and proportional representation favour multi-partism more than five decades ago, no serious effort has ever been made to criticize and revise this hypothesis. No body has ever asked the question: why two different electoral systems, the majority system and the PR system lead to the same type of party system? The problem with Duverger's Hypothesis lies mainly in his classification of party systems. Because he failed to distinguish two distinct types of multi-party systems, he could not see the different political effects of the two different electoral systems. This essay tries to criticize Duverger's classification of party systems and revise the Duverger's Hypothesis into two propositions: (1) The Proportional representation system tends to lead to polarized multi-party system; and (2) The majority system with second-ballot tends to lead to moderate multi-party system. The essay uses the comparison between the Fourth Republic and the Fifth Republic in France for empirical verification of these two propositions. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。