頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 歷史現實中的形而上學=The Metaphysics of Historical Reality |
---|---|
作 者 | 戴暉; | 書刊名 | 哲學與文化 |
卷 期 | 26:2=297 1999.02[民88.02] |
頁 次 | 頁152-167+190-191 |
分類號 | 160 |
關鍵詞 | 形而上學; 歷史現實; 第一科學; 世界理性; 原則能力; 智慧; 有; 死; 繼承性理性; 形而上學的拓樸學; Metaphysics; Historical reality; The first science; World reason; Power of principle; Wisdom; Being; Death; Conceptual reason; Metaphysical topology; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 現代之思從三方面展開思想形態的完整性,對科學的思索對生活世界的思索,對人之本質的思索。出於自身理論的要求,前兩種思考之形態把形而上學拒斥於理解之門以外,形而上學的出現為偶然的。對人的生產性本質之思深入形而上學,認可了它的相對歷史必然性。馬克思、尼采、海德格各自揭示了更為本源的關係:人與他在世的力量、意志、思想之間的關係。作者思的是形而上學的絕對必然性。現代之思本身須讀解為歷史的標記。當代應以之為中介走向形而上學自身本己的現實。這裡須:一、打破所謂的「歷史連續性」,即形而上學是形成技術思維的歷史;二、揭示「虛無的吶喊」中所隱藏的「存在最終的本有」,它是形而上學保藏於歷史中的「神聖」。 |
英文摘要 | Modern thought has developed into what it is today from three sides, a consideration of science, of the living world and of man's essence. The first two systems of thought demand that the theory of a body be considered outside a metaphysical realm. The essence of man can be considered from a relative necessity of history. Marx, Nietzsche, and Heidegger have preceded form an even more basic stance, considering the relationship between man and his will to power, volition and thought. I consider in this paper the absolute necessity of metaphysics. Modern thought must resolve this historical representation. It must go the way of metaphysics in realizing this task. Here we must: 1) Breakthrough the notion of the so-called 'linear history'. Metaphysics must complete a history of technological thought. 2) Reveal existence's ultimate being hidden in the 'cry of nothingness'. This is a metaphysical 'holiness' hidden in history. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。