頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 違法收集證據之排除法則=The Exclusionary Rule of Illegally Obtained Evidence |
---|---|
作 者 | 黃朝義; | 書刊名 | 中原財經法學 |
卷 期 | 4 1998.12[民87.12] |
頁 次 | 頁53-92 |
分類號 | 587.834 |
關鍵詞 | 排除法則; 刑事證據; 刑事訴訟程序; 正當程序; 被告權利; The exclusionary rule; The criminal evidence; Criminal proceeding; Due process; The rights of the accused; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 違法收集之證據是否具有證據能力問題,在刑事證據法中向來頗受爭議。而排除該類證據之適用(證據排除法則)實際上會對犯罪偵查產生重大影響,蓋因偵查人員辛苦取得之證據一旦被排除適用,可能會造成事實之真實面無法發現。惟相對地,過度地要求真實之發現,卻忽略了程序上之公平與公正,亦會破壞偵查程序中的程序正義,因而侵害到被告的權益。因此,一般而論,強調真實發現之同時,亦會重視程序上之正義,並在某些特殊情況下為緩合程序正義之要求,而設有排除之例外情形。 我刑事訴訟程序之運作,充滿了職權進行之色彩。對於證據排除法則之觀念,迄今無法由憲法及刑事訴訟法上得到合理之法源根據,亦無法由實務之見解導出具體之依據。基此,本文基本上除介紹美、日兩國實施之實際情形外,亦擬就我國之現況提出此法則之法制上問題點與建議,供導入此一法則之參考。 |
英文摘要 | The problems arising from the illegally obtained evidence are still unsolved. In fact, the exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence has a significant impact on the conduct of the criminal investigation. If the criminal evidence is excluded, the truth probably will not be found. However, if the emphasis were put excessively on finding the truth without observing the due process, the result would damage the rights of the accused. In general, the due process should be observed during the process of finding of the truth. In some circumstances, some principles should be established concerning the exceptional cases in which the exclusionary rule could be excluded. Our criminal procedure is characterized by the public power. Nowadays, the concept of exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence cannot find the legal basis neither in the Constitution and Criminal Procedure Law of our country, nor in the practice. This article makes an introduction of the application of this rule in United States and in Japan, raising some practical problems, making some suggestions to our legal institutions as to the application of this rule. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。