查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 全球化與社會運動中的企業精神展現=Golbalization and Entrepreneurship in Social Movements |
---|---|
作 者 | 王卓脩; | 書刊名 | 思與言 |
卷 期 | 41:1 2003.03[民92.03] |
頁 次 | 頁69-118 |
專 輯 | 全球化與臺灣社會專輯 |
分類號 | 541.773 |
關鍵詞 | 社會運動; 企業精神; 競租行為; 人際關係網絡; 全球化; 倫理; Social movements; Entrepreneurship; Rent seeking behaviors; Social networks; Golbalization; Ethics; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 首先,本文將討論社會運動的政治意義。作者將由亞羅不可能定理和社會福利概念的衝突來突顯出政治運作才是制度變革中的關鍵,福利經濟學中的成本效益觀點、柏雷托效率的概念基本上是沒有意義的。而且就制度變革的長期與動態觀點來看,社會運動與競租行為可能是無法被明確區分出來的、甚至兩者根本就沒有本質上的差異。 其次,本文將就社會運動團體的主體性與能動性來作探討,焦點放在社會運動團體中關於人的運動力、錢的自主性與議題連結的人際關係網絡等重要課題上,並且將就作者有限經驗所及來探討社會運動中所需要去正視、存在於社會不同層面間的利益競合問題。 最後,作者將以過來人的身分來深入檢討一下學者參與社會運動時的倫理問題。 |
英文摘要 | In this paper we first discuss the political meanings of social movements by the argument that, with conceptual conflicts between Arrow's impossibility theorem and the notion of social welfare in our support, it is political maneuvers that really counts in institutional changes while the whole ideas of cost-benefit analysis and Pareto efficiency as we understand in welfare economics are simply meaningless. As far as is concerned the dynamic long-term aspects of institutional changes, it's likely that there is no way one can tell social movements from rent seeking behaviors. And perhaps even worse, they may simply be two sides of a coin. We then discuss the subjectivity and agency of social movement organizations with emphases focused on important topics such as activism of human resources, financial independence and social networks for agenda cooperation. And, based on the author's limited experiences, conflicts of interests with various groups of people in the society that social movements have to confront with are also discussed. Last but not the least, the author examines in depth ethical issues which a scholar will have to confront with if he/she should determine to truly participate in social movements. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。