頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 成果評量=Outcome Measurement |
---|---|
作者 | 曾修儀; 李麗傳; 曾嘉慧; | 書刊名 | 國防醫學 |
卷期 | 30:5 2000.05[民89.05] |
頁次 | 頁404-410 |
專輯 | 慶祝護士節專輯 |
分類號 | 419.92 |
關鍵詞 | 病患成果; 對護理活動敏感性高的病患成果; 成果評量指標; 成果評量; Patient outcome; Nursing-sensitive patient outcomes; Outcome measurement indicator; Outcome measurement; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 成果評量的研究早在十九世紀初期即已開始,當時多著重於醫療診斷方面,之後多位學者陸續針對不同層面進行成果研究。過去數十年間,健康照護領域朝向以病患為中心,著重病患的需求及希望來訂定健康照護品質的成果。傳統的成果評量探討住院病患死亡率、罹病率以及其他與疾病照顧程序有關的事件,較著重於醫院之照護過程。現今之成果評量範圍較廣,包括經濟評量(如:病患住院天數、住院花費及資源利用)、病患症狀控制、生活品質、生理功能、知識、行為以及對照護的滿意度等。成果評量是一種循環不息的過程,若能執行正確之成果評量,有助於提昇健康照護品質、降低醫療成本、增加臨床與專業連結之有效性。本篇文章針對成果評量之議題做深入之探討,期望由此能提昇病患健康照護品質及降低醫療成本,並達到醫療界的期許。 |
英文摘要 | The study of patient outcomes is not a new endeavor. It had begun in the 19th century. Since that time, the measurement of patient outcomes has been sporadic and frequently focused on medical practice. During the past decades, one of the more crucial advancements in the health care field has been recognition of the centrality of the patient's perspective in monitoring the quality of health care outcomes. Traditionally, outcome measurement has focused on mortality rates, morbidity measures, and other adverse events associated with illness and procedures. Now, outcomes have been broadened to include those that are financial (encompassing length of stay, costs, and resource utilization), symptom control, quality of life, functional performance, knowledge, behavior, and satisfaction with care. The good outcome measurement can promote quality of care, reduce costs and link practice to professional accountability. This article focuses on outcome measurement, and helps to promote quality of care and reduce costs. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。