查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 科學證據與侵權行為法:美國有關邊得克汀訴訟的省思
- 病例雙親對照研究法中基因型相對危險性之估計:Mantel-Haenszel法之應用
- 臨床流行病學講座(16):信賴區間
- 臨床流行病學講座(17):信賴區間
- 火災殘跡鑑定證據能力與證明力之影響因素與評判準則
- 刑事鑑定實務與結果評價問題--以改造槍枝殺傷力鑑定證據之調查與判斷為例
- 科學證據中DNA型鑑定的證據能力--日本足利案件的探討
- 科學證據容許性(證據能力)
- 測謊之可靠性爭議與證據能力
- Confidence Intervals for Multivariate Process Capability Indices Using Bootstrap
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 科學證據與侵權行為法:美國有關邊得克汀訴訟的省思=Law and Science: Some Lessons from the Litigation of Bendectin in U.S. |
---|---|
作 者 | 簡資修; | 書刊名 | 人文及社會科學集刊 |
卷 期 | 11:4 1999.12[民88.12] |
頁 次 | 頁587-613 |
分類號 | 584.338 |
關鍵詞 | 邊得克汀; 證據能力; 陪審團; 科學證據; 普遍接受原則; 相對危險; 信賴區間; 公共利益訴訟; 侵權行為法; 流行病學; Bendectin; Inadmissible; Torts; Jury; General acceptance test; Daubert; Frye; Relative risk; Confidence interval; Public interest litigation; Scientific evidence; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文是以在美國進行的有關邊得克汀訴訟為研究個案,說明科學證據與侵權行為法的關係。該藥劑的服用者與其生下的畸形兒,向法院提起民事訴訟,要求該藥劑的生產者負產品的損害賠償責任的訴訟系爭之點是,該藥劑與畸形兒之生成間的是否具因果關係。經過同儕審查而出版的流行病學研究顯示,其在統計上無顯著的關係,則與之衝突的未經同儕審查的所謂專家證言,是否具證據能力? 另外,在涉及科學證據的訴訟,又應如何解決﹖又在訴訟中,如果有極大的差距,因而引發訴訟衝平的問題,往往又是訴訟對立當事人間的財力科學證據處理不當,造成是非不分,有何社會後果?最後,侵權訴訟程序是否終極解決科學爭執的適當場域? |
英文摘要 | Based on the litigation of bendectin a drug prescribed for pregnant women, this paper explores the relationship between scientific evidence and tort law. In the litigation of bendectin, the case focused on whether infants born with deformities were a direct result of their mothers' taking bendectin during pregnancy. According to published and reviewed epidemiological data, the relationship between bendectin and deformed infants was not statistically significant. Consequently, the following questions are raised:Should courts balance equality and law in litigation involving scientific evidence? What are the social consequences of scientific evidence is purposefull misused? Are the courts the appropriate forum in which to resolve scientific disputes? |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。