查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- The Clition Administration's "Strategic Partnership" with China: A Shift in U.S. East Asia Policy﹖
- U.S. Policy Toward the First Indochina Crisis, 1945-1954: A Prelude to Disaster
- The Freely Associated States of Micronesia Pragmatism vs Principle in U.S. Foreign Policy
- 由35 U.S.C.§ 287(C)之訂定探討人體治療方法之可專利性
- Taiwan in U.S.-PRC Relations
- 淺談USCIB Interbank Compensation的緣由及內容
- Book Review: Banned in the U.S.A.: A Reference Guide to Book Censorship in Schools and Public Libraries. Herbert N. Foerstel. Westport, Conn., Greenwood Press, 1994.
- Security in East Asia and Taiwan's Role
- The U.S.-Taiwan Alliance: Who's in Charge?
- 淺介Moody's Manuals
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | The Clition Administration's "Strategic Partnership" with China: A Shift in U.S. East Asia Policy﹖ |
---|---|
作 者 | Copper,John F.; | 書刊名 | Tamkang Journal of International Affairs |
卷 期 | 3:1 民87.秋 |
頁 次 | 頁27-50 |
分類號 | 558.13 |
關鍵詞 | Clition administration's; U.S.; East asia policy; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
英文摘要 | United States East Asia policy in the 1990s appeared to encompass the idea of a balance of power against the People's Republic of China (PRC) that was comprised of an alignment with Japan and Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries and a local or sub-regional balance of forces in the Taiwan Strait. This policy seemed to evolve naturally from a balance of a different kind that existed before the fall of the Soviet Bloc. It was also a policy that was in consonance with U.S. efforts to limit military spending in order to devote more resources to domestic problems and a reaction to China's growing military power. This policy, however, was seemingly abandoned in favor of a very different strategic out1ook in the summer of 1998 when President Clinton travelled to the PRC and announced a "strategic partnership" with Beijing. The balancing of power policy was ostensibly dropped in favor of a kind of "alignment" with the PRC, in full recognition of its great power status and the fact that Washington perceived that U.S.PRC cooperation was a sine qua non for peace in East Asia and perhaps beyond. Upon further analysis, however, this partnership announcement was considerably less than a new policy, probably not a policy at all, and in essence was repudiated by some in the Clinton Administration and seemingly even by the president himself. This led some critics to think: that the policy of strategic partnership was a trial balloon or simply an effort to divert media attention from other issues at a critical time for the president. There were, in addition, other reasons for thinking the announcement of a strategic partnership did not reflect real shift in U. S. strategic thinking in East Asia. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。