查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 思想史研究中的主體與結構:認真考慮「焦竑與晚明新儒學之重構」中〞與〞的意義
- 如何研究象徵霸權理論與經驗的探索
- 吳爾芙的《歐蘭朵:一部傳記》中譯在臺灣的變形記
- 社會學視角下的母女觀察--以電影《藍色協奏曲》、《喜福會》為例
- 東亞文化交流史中的「去脈絡化」與「再脈絡化」現象及其研究方法論問題
- 大眾史學與口述歷史
- Wineburg的"Reading Like a Historian"教材簡介
- 辯證性-系統性詮釋學之構思:文化際哲思方法學基設初探
- 原民物語--《愛馬的小女孩》和《議事團》的物活論述
- Translations in Religion and Politics: State Feminist Biblical Interpretation
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 思想史研究中的主體與結構:認真考慮「焦竑與晚明新儒學之重構」中〞與〞的意義=Subject and Structure in the Study of Intellectual History: Towards an Understanding of the "Andness" in Chiao Hung and the Restructuring of Neo-Confucianism in the Late Ming |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 宋家復; | 書刊名 | 臺灣社會研究季刊 |
| 卷 期 | 29 1998.03[民87.03] |
| 頁 次 | 頁39-73 |
| 專 輯 | 認同與主體:錢新祖先生紀念專號 |
| 分類號 | 126.93 |
| 關鍵詞 | 前景化; 脈絡; 文本; 時空性; 述句; 話語物件; 話語規律性; Foreground; Context; Text; Situatedness or placedness; Statements; Discursive objects; Discursive regularity; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 本文探討錢新祖老師的思想史方法論,主要取材、但不局限於他《焦竑與晚明新 儒學之重構》一書。第一節首先釐清 " 理論 " 一詞在錢老師 " 前景化 " 思想和教學實踐 中的特殊意義,它並非是等待被套用在中國例證上的外國公式模型,而是對作為主體建構條 件之語言要素的精緻化自述。第二節,藉著分析三本晚近出版的中國思想史著作,嘗試說明 非思想傳記歷史學者如何運用和建構思想 " 脈絡 "。 比較之下,錢老師史學作業的特色, 在於提供了一個豐富而且縝密看待人類思想發展的方式;人類思想發展作為一個文本化的脈 絡,人的主體性在其中不僅有意參與而且深深植床於三價結構化的論述形構之中。關於述句 、物件和規律性這三價結構將在第三節中詳盡分析。 |
| 英文摘要 | This essay is an investigation into my late mentor Edward T. Ch'ien's methodology of intellectual history, as it is practiced most systematically but not exclusively in his Chiao Hung and the Restructuring of Neo-Confucianism in the Late Ming. I start by suggesting that Ch'ien's pedagogical performance of ever-foregrounding be considered as an embodiment of his personal formulation of relating contemporary critical theories to the study of chinese intellectual history. Theory, in Ch'ien's classroom and his research practice as well, is viewed not as a universalizable Western model waiting to be uncritically imposed on any Chinese case, but rather as a well-formulated self-articulation of those linguistic media through which one's whole being is constituted. Secondly, by comparing Chiao Hung and the Restructuring with three other works published later in the same field, I attempt to demonstrate that, once moving beyond the genre of intellectual biography, historians have developed different approaches of dealing with a broader intellectual context, varying from a further elaboration of conventional wisdom to more aggressively interpretive acts of construction. Thirdly, the distinction of Ch'ien's historiographic operation consists in that he provided us a fully-fledged and sophisticated way of conceptualizing human intellectual development as a textualized context, in which human subjectivity is not only actively engaging with but also unintentionally embedded in a triadically-structured discursive formation in terms of uttered statements, deployed objects, and the discursive regularity. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。