查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 腎移植保存液UW及UR溶液之比較= |
---|---|
作者 | 林承家; 賴明坤; 朱聖賢; 莊正鏗; 陳孝文; 陳志碩; |
期刊 | 長庚醫學 |
出版日期 | 19950300 |
卷期 | 18:1 1995.03[民84.03] |
頁次 | 頁48-51 |
分類號 | 416.273 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 腎移植保存液; 急性腎小管壞死; Renal preservation solution; Acute tubular necrosis; |
中文摘要 | 儘管UW溶液已經成功的被證實在肝、胰移植的器官保存上有卓越的成效,但在腎移植方面則屢有爭議。本院在近十二年來有293例的腎移植經驗,其中206例為屍腎移植,而後者經由使用的何存液種類及環孢靈的使用分為三組作比較,發現在同樣使用環孢靈作抗排斥藥物的B組及C組,用UW溶液的C組確實比用UR溶液的B組減少急性腎小管壞死的機率。儘管在植腎的存活率上UW溶液並沒有顯著的改善,但因為減少了術後洗腎及醫院滯留的費用,UW溶液還是值得在腎移植方面採用的。 |
英文摘要 | For the storage of human transplanted organs, the benefit of “UW solution” has been proven especially in keeping a longer preservation time for the liver and pancreases; however, the value for kidney preservation was still debated. A total of 293 cases of renal transplantation were performed over 12 years in our hospital and 206 cases were cadaveric transplants. The latter ones were further divided into 3 groups, according to the immunosuppressive medication and preservation solution used. In the CsA treated groups, the ATN rates significantly decreased in those preserved with the UW solution than with the UR solution. Although the UW solution did not improve the graft survival in our series, it did save the cost for postoperative hemodialysis and shorten the hospital stay which made it cost effective. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。