查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 明代史學的再評價=Revaluation of Historiography of the Ming Dynasty |
---|---|
作者 | 廖瑞銘; Liao, Jui-ming; |
期刊 | 臺灣人文生態研究 |
出版日期 | 19971100 |
卷期 | 1:1 1997.11[民86.11] |
頁次 | 頁19-27 |
分類號 | 601.92 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 明代; 史學; 野史; 正史; 歷史意識; Ming Dynasty; Historiography; Privatehistory; Official history; Historical consciousness; |
中文摘要 | 自明末以來,學者對於明代史學都給予極負面的評價,如張岱謂有明一代「總成 一誣妄世界」;潘耒感嘆「明有天下三百年而史無成書」;萬斯同批判諸家史書「抵牾疏漏 ,無一足滿人意者」;『四庫全書』動輒批評「明人恣從之習,多涉疏舛」;民國以後的「 中國史國史」專著中,也大都沿襲前人成說,認為明代是中國古代史學發展的衰落期。尋其 原因,不外乎兩種:一是明末清初學者們的政治化批評,屬非學術性因素。一是傳統史學重 「正史」而輕「野史」的觀念的延續,是學術性因素。本文嘗試提出新的史學史研究方向, 擬從歷史意識解放的角度切入,重新審視明代史學成就,並對明代史學再評價。 |
英文摘要 | From the Late-Ming Dynasty onwards, scholars have given "a very negative evaluation of Ming Dynasty historiography. For example:Chang Tai described the Ming Dynasty as a false and ridiculous world"; Pan Lay sighed, "the Ming Dynasty existed for three hundred years, but it had no historiography"; Wan Si-Tong criticized every single historical work of the Ming Dynasty as "contradictory and false, none of them is satisfying." ; Si ku chuan shu frequently criticized that "scholars in the Ming Dynasty have unconventional habits, so their scholarship is false", "The Hisory of Chineser "which followed in the Republican period is of the same opinion, assuming that the Ming Dynasty was the weakest oeriod in the historiography:the non-academic cause was that the criticism from scholars in Late-Ming and Early-Ching was political criticism; the academic cause was thge value judgement which privileged offical history over private history. By breaking away from the traditional viewpoint, this paper attempts to apply the new approach of historical consciousness, for study of Chinese historiography, to re-evaluate Ming Dynasty historiography. It will try set forth a new method of historical research, as will be shown in this re-evaluate of Ming Dynasty historiography. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。