頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 中鋼與寶鋼煉鐵現況之比較=The Comparison of Ironmaking Current Status between CSC and SBS Company |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 陳俊良; 李國慶; | 書刊名 | 技術與訓練 |
| 卷 期 | 22:5=186 1997.10[民86.10] |
| 頁 次 | 頁35-41 |
| 專 輯 | 煉鐵專集 |
| 分類號 | 454.81 |
| 關鍵詞 | 粉煤噴吹率; 高爐爐襯更新; PCI rate; Rurmace relining; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 中鋼公司一階工程於 1997 年 12 月竣工,而上海寶山鋼廠之一階工程則於 1985 年底竣工。兩鋼廠均位於沿海良港,使用海外之鐵礦來生產,在性質上很相近。上海寶山鋼 廠位於上海市東北郊,北瀕長江,東臨吳淞口,佔地約 19 平方公里。中鋼則位高雄市小港 ,佔地約 5 平方公里。 寶鋼 1 號高爐並無噴粉煤設備,中鋼則 4 座高爐均有粉煤噴吹設備。由操作實績來看,寶 鋼之產率較中鋼為低,為 1.77 THM/ 米�纂D日,而中鋼為 2.01 THM/ 米�纂D日。寶鋼之燃 料率高出中鋼約為 19kg/THM,唯是噴煤率高出中鋼約 20kg/THM。寶鋼高爐全年停爐時間平 均為 37,331 分 / 座.年,而中鋼為 10,434 分 / 座.年。 中鋼 4 號高爐已於 1996 年 11 月開爐生產,1997 年 6 月開始噴煤,1 號高爐也以 112 天完成第二爐代更新工程,並 於 1997 年 1 月進入第三爐代的生產。 兩鋼廠之粗鋼產量將約略相當, 均將在年產 1000 萬噸左右。中鋼、寶鋼均是海峽兩岸一貫作業鋼廠成功之典範。 |
| 英文摘要 | The first phase construction of China Steel Corporation (CSC) Was completed in December 1997 and that of Shanhai Baoshan Seteel (SBS) was completed at the end of 1985. Both settl plants are located on the coast and adapt over-sea iron ore. There are several similarities betgween CSC is located at Xiao-Gang of Kaohsiung and owns the land area of 5 square kilometers. There is no PCI equipment in SBS No.1 BF. All the four blast furnaces are equipped with PCI facilities in CSC. The productivity and fuel rate of CSC are better than those of SBS, but PC rate of CSC is lower than that of SBS. CSC No.4 BF was started blow-in in November 1996 and started to inject PC in June 1997. CSC No.1 BF 3rd campaign were blown-in in January after 112 days of relining. The annual crude settl productions of both steel plants would be very near and are around 10 million tons. Both CSC and SBS are the successful paragons of the integrated steel plants at both sides of TAIWAN strait. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。