頁籤選單縮合
題名 | A Survey of Empty Categories in GB, GPSG, and LFG=管制捆綁理論,一般性詞組語法和詞彙功能語法之虛範疇理論探討 |
---|---|
作者 | 吳黌銘; Wu, Horng-ming; |
期刊 | 國立中興大學臺中夜間部學報 |
出版日期 | 19971100 |
卷期 | 3 1997.11[民86.11] |
頁次 | 頁231-258 |
分類號 | 801.4 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 虛範疇; 重複詞; 代詞; 管制範疇; Empty category; Anaphor; Pronominal; Governing category; |
中文摘要 | 當代語言學主流的句法理論研究,基本上可區分為三大派別:管制捆綁理論, 一 般性詞組語法,和詞彙功能語法。而每個派別的虛範疇理論皆有其獨特之處。譬言,管制捆 綁理論根據重複詞和代詞的區別來把虛範疇分為四類:名詞片語的遺跡,小虛詞,大虛詞, 和疑問詞的遺跡。一般性詞組語法的虛範疇,則使用零成分來表示一個成分在表面結構上的 遺缺,亦即一般所謂的〞遺跡〞。而詞彙功能語法的虛範疇,是透過〞控制理論〞在功能結 構裡,處理主詞省略和移位的詞組結構,予以說明。 本篇論文主要在比較虛範疇於此三種句法理論之異同處,並進一步探討各個理論處理虛範疇 的基本假設。 |
英文摘要 | Current researches in syntax have produced three competing syntactic theories: Government-Binding Theory (GB), Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar (GPSG), and Lexical-Functional Grammar (LFG). In each theory the description of empty categories has its own distinguishing feature. In GB (Chomsky 1982:78), empty categories are classified into four natural classes by the anaphor-pronominal distinction, namely, NP-trace, pro, PRO, and variable. In GPSG (GKPS 1985), the empty category is represented by the NULL feature to put it into a code that an element is phonologically empty, often called by the name "trace". In LFG (Bresnan 1982), the empty category is portrayed by employing the theory of control to deal with the missing subject and displaced phrase constructions in functional structure. The purpose of this paper is to compare the similarities and differences of empty categories among these three theories, and to show how their treatment of empty categories reflects their assumptions. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。