查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 民營遊樂區評鑑因素之研擬= |
---|---|
作者 | 侯錦雄; |
期刊 | 東海學報 |
出版日期 | 19950700 |
卷期 | 36:6(農學院) 民84.07 |
頁次 | 頁103-118 |
分類號 | 992.3 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 民營; 遊樂區; Criteria determination; Private recreational areas; Analytic hierarchy process; |
中文摘要 | 民營遊樂區之評鑑,是政府部門重要的行政工作之一,其目的是為輔導業者正確的 經營理念,並提供省民確保遊憩安全之遊憩機會及高品質遊憩效益。本研究首先建立了環境 品質、經營及效益三位一體的評估架構,並將評鑑項目經過問卷調查、專家討論、因素分析 及層級分析法以建立各因素及其權重表;配合實例之評分操作後,更容納產、官、學各方 意見加以修正。研擬出可供評鑑作業參考之評鑑因素。 調查結果依評鑑者對各項目之重要性加以討論,經分析得八項重要因素,其解釋變異量 達71.8%,再依其特性將其分為兩個階層,透過層級分析得知評鑑者均認為環境品質,乃設 施設計的合法性、安全性及合理性為最重要,佔全部比重的51%;在經營管理層面上則佔33% ,效益層級以16%為最輕。此評鑑因素再經過對九個遊樂區試評結果,具有其可行性與操作 性。 |
英文摘要 | The evaluation of private recreational areas is an important task for Taiwan Tourism Administration. The purpose of the evaluation is to assist the private sectors improving their management that affords safe and quality areas for the vistors. This study investigates how to establish the context and weight of evaluation criteria. The research methods include questionnaire survey, professional discussion, factor analysis, and analytic heirarchy process (AHP). The opinions of government and private administors and scholars are assembled and discussed to build up an evaluation model. The evaluation model is composed of three parts environment quality', 'administration, and 'benefits'. Eight factors are derived and accounted for 71.8% variance. The resuults of analytic hierarchy proces show the environment development is the most important criteria that accounted for 51% weight. The administration accounted for 33% and benefit for 16% nespectively. Nine recreational areas are selected to test this evaluation criteria system. The results verifty the criteria system is workable as well as useful for private recreational areas evaluation. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。