頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 經濟政治批判:提出一種符合批判觀點的馬克思主義經濟政治觀=Critique of Economical Politics: from a View of Marxism |
---|---|
作者 | 王賀白; Wang, Herbert; |
期刊 | 東吳政治學報 |
出版日期 | 19970900 |
卷期 | 8 1997.09[民86.09] |
頁次 | 頁117-156 |
分類號 | 550.1357 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 經濟政治; 批判; 政治人類學; 市場; 國家; 整體性法律; Economical politics; Critique; Political anthropology; Market; State; Law as integrity; |
中文摘要 | 本文首先提出「經濟政治之謎」作為全文問題意識:也就是,在理論上知道,完美的公共選擇不管由市場決定或由國家決定都不可能達到;然而在實際上,公眾生活中卻無時無刻要進行公共選擇。在以Mill為主的「經濟政治理想」和以 Marx 為主的「經濟政治現實」討論中,更清楚地說明了「經濟政治之謎」的緊張性。 另外在「政治人類學觀點下的經濟政治」則是一方面提出 Polanyi 的經濟從屬社會的主張,另一方面,則以目前嚴重的南北問題與生態問題說明經濟政治批判的必要。然而,馬克思主義對資本主義的批評仍舊是一種經濟政治,只是作為資本主義的對立而存在,這在冷戰結束過程中更可看出。因此,說馬克思主義沒有一套漸進可行的政治經濟學是可以成立的。本文認為,從Dworkin的Law’s Empire 書中的「整體性法律」觀點, 可以找到彌補馬克思主義這一方面的不足。 這個「整體性法律」告訴我們:「因襲主義」與「實用主義」的公共選擇,只是少數有權有勢的人才有權決定,是不足取的,而這樣的公共選擇是有害於政治的,因此,在公眾政治的範疇中必須否認這樣的公共選擇;而我們要肯的是那個可以在公眾中推己及人的「整體性」觀點,它指出公共選擇必須由全體人民共同決定。 |
英文摘要 | This paper regards “the enigma of economic politics” as the main question : people can’t get perfect public choices determined by state or by market theoretically, and yet they make public choices constantly practically. First of all, I explore the extension of enigma between “the Ideal of Economic Politics” from Mill’s thought and “the Reality of Economic Politics” from Marx’s. And then, “the Economic Politics of Political Anthropology” explains that the economy should be subjected to society on the one hand, and the crisis of South-North and ecology force us to face the problems of economic politics on the other hand. After all the explanation does not represent resolution , therefore, we may say there is no desirably political economy in Marxism still. In a dilemma of this enigma, this paper argues that “Dworkin’s theory of law as integrity” can fill up the deficiency of Marxism. The theory of law as integrity argues that: we should renounce the public choices determined by “conventionalism” or by “pragmatism” because only the privileged classes have the powers to decide the public choices ; in contrast we could demand the public choices deternmined by “integrity” because all the classes have the rights to deternmine. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。