查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 矮性菜豆栽培方法之探討
- 激勃素處理及栽培密度對紅豆生育性狀的影響
- 蘿蔔栽植密度試驗
- 懷山藥新品系TYS8001定植期及栽培密度試驗
- 不同海拔穴盤苗、栽培月份和栽培密度對農友301品種番茄秋作生育與產量之影響
- 栽培密度與留花序數對番茄果實產量、品質與採收期的影響
- 栽培密度對茄子生育與產量之影響
- 數學模式分析甜椒植株性狀和產量對栽培密度的反應
- 不同基因型、栽培密度及收穫期對落花生產量及品質的影響
- Agronomic Characteristics of Various Cultivars of Common Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) and Analysis of Their Seed Compositions
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 矮性菜豆栽培方法之探討 |
---|---|
作者 | 黃天成; 溫英源; 胡懋麟; | 書刊名 | 嘉義農專學報 |
卷期 | 35 1993.11[民82.11] |
頁次 | 頁1-9 |
分類號 | 435.291 |
關鍵詞 | 矮性菜豆; 播種方法; 栽培密度; Bush bean; Seeding method; Planting density; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本試驗目的在比較五種不同播種方法(1.不整地、點播、覆土,2.不整地、 條播、覆土,3.不整地、撒播、覆土,4.整地(耕犁)、撒播、不覆土,5.不整地、 撒播、不覆土、覆蓋稻桿)及二種栽植密度(1.正常密度(25株/m,),2.較高密度(35 株/m��))對矮性菜豆產量之影響,結果如下:1.點播及條播處理之分枝數、單株莢 數及單株產量比撒播處理顯著的高,但對每莢粒數、百粒重則沒有顯著差異。2. 在正常種植密度下,以點播覆土、條播覆土及撒播覆土之小區產量最高,三者沒 有顯著差異,整地撒播不覆土之小區產量次之,不整地撒播不覆土之小區產量最 低,其差異均達顯著。在較高種植密度下,以點播覆土、條播覆土之小區產量最 高,二者間沒有顯著差異,撒播覆土之小區產量次之,而整地撒播不覆土及不整 地撒播不覆土之小區產量最差,其差異均達顯著。3.種植密度較高時,除每莢粒 數及百粒重沒有顯著差異外,其分枝數、有效莢數、單株產量均顯著降低,株高 則顯著增高。4.不整地撒播不覆土、只覆切碎的稻桿之播種之方法,發現其分枝 數、單林莢數、顯著的高。但在小區產量方面則以種植較高密度且施一次追肥有 較佳的產量:與單株產量,在正常種植密度下,施一次追肥要比在較高種植密度 下,施一次追肥對照處理(不整地撒播覆土)的產量沒有顯著差異。 |
英文摘要 | The objectives of this study were to compare the effect of five different cultural methods (l. non-tillage-dibbling-covering with soil. 2. non – tillage – drilling - coveringwith soil. 3. non-tillage-broadcastmg-covermg with soil, 4. tillage- broadcasting-withoutcovering soil, and 5. tillage-broadcasting-covering with paddy straw) and two plantingdensities (l.normal density: 25 plants/m��, 2.high density: 35 plants/m��) on kernelyield of Bush bean. The results were summarized as follows: 1. Branch, pod number, and kernel yield per plant were significantly higher indibbling and drilling treatments than in those of broadcasting treatments, kernelnumber per pod and 100-kernel weight, however, were not significantly differentamong treatments. 2. Under normal planting 'density, dibbling-, drilling-, and broadcasting-coveringwith soil gave highest yield, followed by tillage-broadcasting-without covering soiland then non-tillage-broadcasting-without covering soil. The fifference among treatments reached significant level. Under high planting density, however, dibbling anddrilling treatments gave highest yield, followed by broadcasting-covering with soiltreatment. Tillage-broadcasting-without covering soil and non-tillage-broadcastingwithout covering soil gave lowest yield. The differences were also significant. 3. Under high planting density, branch, pod number, and kernel yield per plantdecreased significantly whereas plant height increased significantly. Kernel numberper pod and 100-kernel weight did not show significant difference. 4. Application of follow-up fertilizer once in non-tillage-broadcasting-coveringwith paddy straw treatment gave higher branch, pod number per plant, and kernelyield per plant under normal planting density than that of high planting density.High planting density and applied with one follow-up fertilizer however, gave betteryield which was not different from that of the control (non-tillage-broadcasting-covering with soil) significantly. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。