查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 書評:何光國著《圖書館學理論基礎》(臺北市:三民, 2001)
- 書評:Amartya Sen, The Standard of Living (Cambridge University Press, 1987)
- 書評:東海大學東亞社會經濟研究中心主編‧1997《地方社會》‧聯經出版事業公司
- 書評:社會工作需要什麼樣的研究法﹖簡春安、鄒平儀合著. 1998年1月.《社會工作研究法》. 臺北:巨流圖書公司. 468頁
- 建立優良的教科書審定制度
- 「孔恩一生」的歷史與社會脈絡--評吳以義著《庫恩》一書 (臺北市:東大圖書公司, 1996)
- 近十年來大陸地區書目出版述評
- Book Review: An Introduction to Information Resource Management (信息資源管理導論). By Meng Guangjun, et al[孟廣均等]. Beijing: Science Press, 1998. 455p. ISBN: 7-03-006493-3.
- Book Review: Modern Theory of Library Science (現代圖書館學理論)
- Book Review: Library of the 21st Century (21世紀圖書館新論). By Wu Jianzhong [吳建中]. Shanghai Science & Technology Press, 1998. 228p. ISBN 7-5439-1276-7.
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 書評:何光國著《圖書館學理論基礎》(臺北市:三民, 2001)=Book Review: James K. K. Ho, «The Foundation of Library Science Theory» |
---|---|
作 者 | 盧荷生; | 書刊名 | 國家圖書館館刊 |
卷 期 | 90:1 民90.06 |
頁 次 | 頁223-232 |
分類號 | 020.1 |
關鍵詞 | 書評; 何光國; 圖書館學理論基礎; Book review; James K. K. Ho; The foundation of library science theory; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
英文摘要 | For many years Taiwan's library community has hoped to establish an integrated theoretical system for library science, thereby giving library science "respectable" scientific methodology, as many people doubt whether library science represents a true academic subject. However, to establish a theoretical base, one must be extremely careful to hold to the scope of a "foundation," by neither surpassing nor failing to meet its strict boundaries. In other words, what does the scope of foundation of theories on library science encompass? One fears that this could be stretched too far and lack focus by incorporating fields that are closely related to, but not necessarily strictly belonging to, library science. This would weaken this foundation's focus and make it less solid. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。