查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- The Constitutional Debates on the New Deal in the United States: The Study of Judicial Influence on Government Policy
- 從美國最高法院Marbury v. Madison判決論我國大法官釋字第九號、第三七一號解釋之推論基礎
- 司法違憲審查的制度選擇與司法院定位
- The Supreme Court and Public Policy in the United States
- 論我國普通法院法官之釋憲聲請權
- 從司法消極主義走向司法積極主義--以日本違憲審查之積極化條件與傾向為中心
- 司法一元化之借鏡--以日本最高法院組成與權限為中心
- 法官在人民聲請釋憲程序之新角色--最高法院的選案權
- 法官在人民聲請釋憲程序之新角色--最高法院的選案權
- 論我國法官之違憲審查權
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | The Constitutional Debates on the New Deal in the United States: The Study of Judicial Influence on Government Policy=美國新政的憲法爭議:司法對政府政策影響之探討 |
---|---|
作者 | 蘇俊斌; Su, Chun-pin; |
期刊 | 致理法學 |
出版日期 | 20100300 |
卷期 | 7 2010.03[民99.03] |
頁次 | 頁63-84 |
分類號 | 574.52 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 新政; 經濟大恐慌; 最高法院; 違憲審查; 美國憲法; 羅斯福總統; The New Deal; The Great Depression; The supreme court; Judicial review; Human rights; The U.S. constitution; President Franklin D. Roosevelt; |
英文摘要 | In order to resolve the Great Depression, President Franklin D. Roosevelt adopted the New Deal, which aimed at a powerful and centralized government, and would profoundly intervene in people’s economic activities and limit their economic freedoms. However, the New Deal was fiercely opposed by many Americans, particularly the conservative justices at the Supreme Court. The Court repeatedly used the power of judicial review to strike down many programs of the New Deal. These acts provoked President Roosevelt and aroused a serious conflict between the judicial and political branches. Although the Court changed its attitude to the New Deal later, it caused a constitutional controversy. This paper focuses on the constitutional debates on the New Deal and examines the judicial influence on governmental policies. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。