查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Colonial Space and Body in Arthur Conan Doyle's The Sign of Four=亞瑟柯南道爾「四簽名」中的殖民空間和身體 |
---|---|
作者 | 邱玉萍; Chiu, Yu-ping; |
期刊 | 康大學報 |
出版日期 | 20190600 |
卷期 | 9 2019.06[民108.06] |
頁次 | 頁13-29 |
分類號 | 873.57 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 亞瑟柯南道爾; 四簽名; 殖民身體; 殖民空間; Arthur Conan Doyle; The Sign of Four; Colonial bodies; Colonial space; |
中文摘要 | 本論文旨在討論亞瑟柯南道爾「四簽名」小說中的身體和空間。本論文欲指出即便道爾企圖在小說結束時回歸父權對殖民和英國本地治理的傳統,但其小說在身體和倫敦空間的呈現上則顯現出相悖的特質。在1888年出版的這本小說中,可見得道爾似乎想要參與英國於1890年代興趣的印度殖民地反叛論述,而在這本小說所創造出的虛構歷史中,印度殖民地反叛而佔了重要篇章,亦成為引響小說現在時序的重要因素。本論文試圖將道爾「四簽名」小說放回此脈落,並嘗試在此脈落中理解道爾所塑造出的角色和空間的模糊性。 |
英文摘要 | This essay preoccupies on the representation of body and space in Arthur Conan Doyle's The Sign of Four, and believes that despite Doyle's attempt to form a definite conclusion of patriarchal order in this fiction, the bodily and spatial representation of this fiction betrays his inner debate and uncertainties about the colonial history, in which the Indian Mutiny is a chapter. Doyle creates a "historical" narrative that occurred thirty years ahead of the fiction's present time frame, and embeds the history into the actual history of the 1887-88 Indian Mutiny. The "fictional" history becomes the force that strongly influences the fiction's present movement, in which Doyle addresses the Mutiny history and seems not able to come to a definite conclusion. In the following section of this essay, the essay aims at the representation of the bodies of the characters: Tonga, Mary Morstan and Sholto twins, and illustrates the equally ambiguous spatial representation of the city London. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。