頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 從實際給付金額與民眾訴願理由檢視臺灣預防接種受害救濟給付制度=Review of Vaccine Injury Compensation Program based on Compensated Amount and Petition Reasons, 2006–2015 |
---|---|
作者 | 黃薰瑩; 林詠青; 張育綾; | 書刊名 | 疫情報導 |
卷期 | 34:23 2018.12.04[民107.12.04] |
頁次 | 頁366-374 |
分類號 | 412.4 |
關鍵詞 | 預防接種; 救濟制度; 救濟金; Vaccination; Compensation system; Relief; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究回顧2006年至2015年間因申請預防接種受害救濟而提起之訴願案,提起訴願理由之大宗除對審議小組所為預防接種後不良反應與預防接種之相關性為爭執外,次大宗則是對於救濟金給付額度為爭執,其主張理由包括受害人因預防接種後不良反應所致身心病痛、照顧受害人之經濟損失及不良反應之相關衍生費用。而從法規之演進可以看出法定給付上限皆逐年增加,然觀察實際給付情形,死亡及身心障礙案件之實際給付並未有明顯上升趨勢。嚴重疾病給付方面,2013年至2015年之給付趨勢幾近持平,其他不良反應給付則有上升之趨勢。自民眾對於預防接種受害救濟審定結果訴願訴訟爭執之理由,可以看出民眾對於制度的疑慮,可見救濟金之給付、補償項目或計算基準仍值得持續討論及思考。 |
英文摘要 | This study reviewed petitions for Vaccine Injury Compensation Program between 2006 and 2015. The most common claim for petition was disagreement on the decision on causality assessment between the adverse event and the vaccination, followed by unsatisfactory amount of compensation. The main reasons for unsatisfactory amount of compensation included physical and mental sickness due to vaccination, the economic loss for taking care of the victim, and related expenses due to adverse reaction. As long as the relevant regulations evolved, the upper limits for all relief items were increasing in 2013-2015. However, except for the compensation for other adverse reactions, the actual compensation amount for death, disabilities, or serious illness remained relatively constant. The gaps in expectation for higher amount from victims may bring doubts and dissatisfactions. More discussions related to compensation items and standards are needed for improving the program. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。