查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 臺灣總生育率再分析--ACF法的運用=Re-examination of Taiwan's Total Fertility Rate: An Application of the ACF Method |
---|---|
作者 | 王德睦; 劉一龍; Wang, Te-mu; Liu, Yilong; |
期刊 | 人口學刊 |
出版日期 | 20080600 |
卷期 | 36 2008.06[民97.06] |
頁次 | 頁37-65 |
分類號 | 516.1 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 總生育率; 生育步調; B-F法; SVD模型; ACF法; TFR; Tempo effect; B-F method; SVD model; ACF measure; |
中文摘要 | 灣總生育率(TFR)的持續下跌引發眾多討論,TFR 為一種估計測量,容易受婦女生育的數量(quantum)與步調(tempo,又稱生育的時間效果)之變化而影響,由於許多國家調查的「理想子女數」仍保持在兩名水準,但是TFR 卻遠低於替換水準,BongaartsandFenny (1998)認為這是生育步調延後所致,婦女實際的生育水準不若觀察值那樣低。不少學者提出調整方法,希望降低婦女生育步調的影響,以獲得實際的生育水準,其中,Bongaarts 等人提出的B-F法運用最為廣泛,然而,B-F 法只是去除生育時間效果後的總生育率調整值,依舊無法代表實際生育水準,必須以其他方法來探討女性的生育水準。我們藉由Schoen(2004)的ACF 法來調整TFR ,只是ACF 法得待所有婦女完成生育方能運用,本文乃透過LiandWu(2003)建議的SVD 模型推估未完成生育之年輪未來的生育率。本文使用B-F法與ACF 法來調整1980 年至2005 年台灣的TFR ,經過比較,ACF 法的結果比BF 法之估計更加接近CFR ,二種結果都指出目前台灣婦女之生育水準仍高於千分之1300(2005 年B-F 法之結果為千分之1545,ACF 法的結果為千分之1399),調整值雖未落入「超低生育水準(lowestlow)」,但也不若「理想子女數」高。 |
英文摘要 | The TFR in Taiwan has declined more rapidly and pervasively than was expected. The TFR is a hypothetical measure, which can be influenced by two distinct parts: a ‘quantum’ component and a 'tempo' component. ‘Many countries’ ‘desired children number’ is kept at 2, but the TFR is far below 2. Bongaarts and Fenny criticized the TFR due to the changes in the timing of child bearing. Therefore, they announced the B-F method to shed the timing effect in order to more reliably capture fertility. However the tempo-free TFR method still can't represent the reality of fertility; we have to make use of other measures. We employed Liand Wu's SVD model and Schoen's ACF method to adjust the 1980-2005 TFR in Taiwan. The output of the ACF method was closer to the CFR. Both findings of the B-F method and ACF measure indicated that the TFR in Taiwan was above 1.3, the lowest-low fertility level. But the adjusted TFRs still did not reach 2. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。