查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 亞洲開發銀行、亞洲貨幣基金、東協加三總體經濟研究室及亞洲基礎設施投資銀行:創建區域金融制度之比較
- 綻びを見せる米英の「特別な関係」--対中経済外交における暗闘
- 歐盟與美國之農業貿易紛爭
- Media Reproduction of Masculinity in Sports--A Case Study of New Zealand's Yacht Race Victory in the America's Cup
- 臺灣同志運動的後殖民思考:論“現身”問題
- 三臺藝文新聞報導解讀--從文化霸權論的觀點分析
- 宗教類非營利組織之符號管理初探
- 冷戰後美國的大戰略:建立單極霸權體系之挑戰
- 冷戰後中共與俄羅斯軍事合作關係之研究
- The Deliverer: Moses in the Grass is Singing
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 亞洲開發銀行、亞洲貨幣基金、東協加三總體經濟研究室及亞洲基礎設施投資銀行:創建區域金融制度之比較=ADB, AMF, AMRO and AIIB: Comparative Analysis of Establishing Regional Financial Institutions |
---|---|
作者 | 濱中慎太郎; 沈慧宜; Hamanaka, Shintaro; |
期刊 | 全球政治評論 |
出版日期 | 20160100 |
卷期 | 特集003 2016.01[民105.01] |
頁次 | 頁119-134 |
分類號 | 562.48 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 區域金融制度; 區域領導; 霸權; 阻擋權; 亞洲基礎設施投資銀行; Regional financial institutions; Regional leadership; Hegemon; Blocking power; Asia infrastructure investment bank; AIIB; |
中文摘要 | 在亞洲居優勢地位的國家總渴望建立一個區域金融制度,以取得獨有領導權。過去,日本在1960 年代建立亞洲開發銀行(ADB)並於1990 年代提出亞洲貨幣基金(AMF),皆是基於此立場,但現在積極建立區域制度的是中國。在此背景下,中國的亞洲基礎設施投資銀行(AIIB)並不是個令人驚訝的提議。關於AIIB 特別的是美國的反應。美國成功的從內部阻擋日本的AMF 提議,但她試圖從外部阻止中國卻失敗。組織結構,特別是優勢權力間的平等,對於否能成功建立制度也是重要的。當兩個(或以上)國家同意接受平等的立足點,區域制度則較容易存在。其他國家也會因為某組織並非由單一國家主導而感到安心。在亞洲開發銀行裡日本與美國是平等的且日本與中國在東協加三總體經濟研究辦公室(AMRO)與清邁倡議多邊化協議(CMIM)也是同等地位。除非美國與日本加入,否則亞洲基礎設施投資銀行有可能受到單一國家主導。 |
英文摘要 | The dominant country in Asia always desires to establish a regional financial institution to assume some exclusive leadership. Japan, which established Asian Development Bank (ADB) in the 1960s and proposed Asian Monetary Fund (AMF) in the 1990s, was in such a position in the past, but it is now China that is keen to establish regional institutions. In this context, China’s Asia Infrastructure Investment bank (AIIB) is not a surprising proposal. What is unique with regard to AIIB is the reaction of the US. While it successfully blocked Japan’s AMF proposal from inside, it attempted to block AIIB from outside without success. Institutional configuration, especially the parity between the dominant powers, is also important for an institution to be successfully established. When two (or more) countries agree to accept equal footing, a regional institution is likely to come into existence. Other countries also feel comfortable with an organization where no single country becomes too dominant. There is parity between Japan and the US in ADB and that between Japan and China in ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office (AMRO) and Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization (CMIM). AIIB could be dominated by a single country, unless the US and Japan participate. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。