查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 初探文化創意產業的智慧財產權保護--以產品設計之著作權及設計專利為中心=Protection of Intellectual Property Rights for Cultural and Creative Industries Focus on Copyright and Design Patent for Product Design |
---|---|
作者 | 蘇南; Su, Nan; |
期刊 | 真理財經法學 |
出版日期 | 20140300 |
卷期 | 12 2014.03[民103.03] |
頁次 | 頁35-112 |
分類號 | 588.3 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 智慧財產權; 文化創意; 產品設計; 著作權; 商標權; 設計專利; Intellectual property; Cultural creativity; Product design; Copyright; Trademark; Design patent; |
中文摘要 | 文化創意產業具有創造財富及增加就業機會之潛力,智慧財產權也對其發展具有關鍵作用;本文以著作權法、商標法及專利法,析論文創產業如何藉這些智慧財產權保障權利及解決紛爭,並以產品設計為論述核心。本文首先介紹《文化創意產業發展法》的立法目的及保護範圍。其次闡述如何以著作權法、商標法及設計專利保障文創產品設計成果,並舉個別法規說明對產品設計的保護方式及限制,說明文創產業及設計業與智財權的關聯性。進一步,對於產品設計是否具有可著性、商標近似之判斷及設計專利與著作權之區別等爭議問題,本文也援引國內外學說、相關法制及判決實務,對其運用類型及事實認定,提出初步探討與看法。希望藉由本文的結合法律與文創特性,淺探為何設計人員與法律人員對於相關爭議的認知有問外,也提醒這兩領域應加強對話,俾尋求對產品設計保護最大化。 |
英文摘要 | Cultural and creative industries to create wealth and has the potential to increase employment opportunities, intellectual development. property also has a key role in their of copyright, This paper will investigate the legal effect trademark and patent law on creative industries,and how the rights guaranteed by intellectual property rights and resolve disputes,furthermore the product design as discussed in this paper. First introduces the purpose and legal effect of theCultural and creative industry development Act,Second will describe how to Copyright,Trademark Act and Design patent protection to product and service of cultural creative industries and industry design,both Judicial decisions and dispute cases by legal interpretation for product design,indicating the relevance of cultural and creative industries,product design with intellectual property rights.Further, whether the product design can be the object of artistic works by Design patent is significant, the judgment about similar on trademarks, and the difference between patent and copyright disputes for product design. Finally, this paper also compare with foreign related doctrine, legal system, and legal practice to evaluate the use of type and factual findings for a preliminary study and views. I hope through this combination of legal and cultural and creative characteristics to understand why designers and legal staff for the dispute have different cognition, but also to remind the two fields should strengthen dialogue to maximize the protection of product design by intellectual property right. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。