查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Rethinking of the "2006 Draft of the Genetic Resources Act of Taiwan" from the Perspective of Implementation Regarding Access and Benefit-Sharing (ABS) Regimes
- 生物多樣性公約與智慧財產權
- 基因改造食品之各國管理現況介紹
- 與貿易有關之智慧財產權協定與生物多樣性公約之衝突與調和:以生物遺傳資源之取得與利益分享為探討中心
- 生物遺傳資源之取得與利益分享之國際法發展趨勢
- An Empirical Study of Access and Benefit-Sharing Regimes and Plant Variety Protection Regarding Plant Genetic Resources among Developed Countries
- 杜哈回合我國立場及後續對企業之影響--智慧財產權部分
- 無主物、共同遺產與公有物--遺傳與生物資源公約中的財產意識
- 兩岸智慧財產權之研究
- 網際網路智慧財產權問題
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Rethinking of the "2006 Draft of the Genetic Resources Act of Taiwan" from the Perspective of Implementation Regarding Access and Benefit-Sharing (ABS) Regimes=2006年臺灣遺傳資源法草案之再思考--從接近及利益分享機制之實踐開始談起 |
---|---|
作者 | 陳匡正; Chen, Kuang-cheng; |
期刊 | 生物產業科技管理叢刊 |
出版日期 | 20120700 |
卷期 | 3:2 2012.07[民101.07] |
頁次 | 頁1-43 |
分類號 | 588.36 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 接近及利益分享機制; 植物遺傳資源; 臺灣遺傳資源法草案; 智慧財產權; 生物多樣性公約; 國際農糧公約; Access and benefit-sharing regime; Plant genetic resources; Draft of the Genetic Resources Act of Taiwan; Intellectual property rights; Convention on Biological Diversity; International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture; |
中文摘要 | 接近及利益分享機制乃是源起與植物遺傳資源有關的國際條約之規範,如生物多樣性公約和國際農糧公約,然其功能在於平衡與分配已開發及開發中國家間之利益。在強調生物科技產業發展的臺灣,由於植物遺傳資源有其經濟及醫療之功能,故保護植物遺傳資源在臺灣是重要的。臺灣遺傳資源法草案乃是由行政院農業委員會,委託學者於2006年草擬二稿完成,而當中則針對接近及利益分享機制,有相當比例之規範。雖然遺傳資源法草案不只有接近及利益分享機制之規定,但它卻是生物科技產業的發展之一個重要里程碑。特別是在2011年新修正的專利法排除植物為受專利保護之標的,以及在2010年「海峽兩岸智慧財產權保護合作協議」簽訂後,針對植物品種及種苗法優先權之修訂。本文不僅探討臺灣有關接近及利益分享機制之法律外,還嘗試討論遺傳資源法草案在未來通過立法前,遺傳資源法、專利法、植物品種及種苗法等法律之間的互動關係。 |
英文摘要 | Access and benefit-sharing regimes are founded by international agreements concerning plant genetic resources (PGRs) in the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGR), which attempt to balance and allocate interests of PGRs between developed and developing countries. PGRs have potential economic and medical value in the development of the Taiwanese biotechnology industry; therefore, conservation of PGRs is crucial for Taiwan. The second ”Draft of the Genetic Resources Act of Taiwan” was finished in 2006 by scholars appointed by the Executive Yuan to the Council of Agriculture. ABS regulations form a significant portion of these statutes. Although the statutes contain other provisions, the ABS regulations were an important milestone for the development of the Taiwanese biotechnology industry. In particular, plants did not become the subject matter of the Patent Act in the 2010 and 2011 amendments of the Priority Right to the Plant Variety and Plant Seed Act after the ”Cross-Strait Intellectual Property Right Protection Cooperation Agreement” was signed in 2010. This article not only discusses current ABS laws in Taiwan but also attempts to discuss potential interactions among the Draft of the Genetic Resources Act of Taiwan, Patent Act, and Plant Variety and Plant Seed Act should the Draft of the Genetic Resources Act of Taiwan be passed in the future. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。