查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- DGPS與PPP於空載光達解算定位精度成果之研究
- Extraction of Surface Features from LiDAR Point Clouds Using Incremental Segmentation Strategy
- 整合光達點雲與空照影像重建三維建物模型
- 光達點雲幾何特徵萃取及匹配
- 模塑臺北地理好形象--臺北市地理圖資建置與回顧
- 使用車載光達進行鋪面平整度偵測可行性研究
- 結合空載光達點雲與航照影像進行房屋模型之變遷偵測
- 光達點雲平面特徵自動化匹配於航帶平差之應用
- 小波演算法重建點雲覆蓋面
- 資料整合與資料倉儲的相關議題:資料聯邦(federation)或合併(consolidation)
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | DGPS與PPP於空載光達解算定位精度成果之研究=A Comparison of Positioning Accuracy for Airborne LIDAR Data Solved by DGPS and PPP |
---|---|
作者 | 吳歷韋; 劉進金; 徐偉城; 鐘郁翔; 陳慧鵬; Wu, Li-wei; Liu, Jin-king; Hsu, Wei-chen; Chung, Yu-hsiang; Chen, Hui-peng; |
期刊 | 航測及遙測學刊 |
出版日期 | 20141100 |
卷期 | 19:1 2014.11[民103.11] |
頁次 | 頁1-11 |
分類號 | 440.98 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | GPS時間戳記; 航帶平差; 資料合併; 地面參考站; 光達點雲; GPS timestamp; Strip adjustment; Data merge; Base station; LiDAR LAS; |
中文摘要 | 空載光達點雲精度深受GPS定位精度影響。空載光達施測時,於台灣部份已是人煙罕至高山區域架設地面參考基站,這是一項挑戰不可能的任務。因此,本研究嘗試運用精密單點定位(PPP)定位解算,作為不易架設地面基站區域之替代方案可能性。PPP主要是以IGS公告衛星精密星曆及精密時鐘差修正資料,輔助以單點無差分方式進行定位,可達成後處理高精度的定位成果。本研究分別以差分定位(DGPS)與PPP兩種解算方式,在6條空載光達掃瞄航線中選出調查區塊進行比較。首先,比較兩種解算方式產出之航跡差異。再以DGPS及PPP各別解算航跡產出光達離散點雲LASer(LAS)成果,以對應時間戳記比較平差前、後點雲兩種解算方式差量。另外,以結合DGPS及PPP各別產出LAS平差成果與僅DGPS解算產出LAS平差成果比較,試瞭解在難以設置地面基站作業區域中PPP替代DGPS可能性。本研究結論DGPS及PPP兩種解算方式於不同大地基準情況下,PPP產出之航帶點雲能有效利用航帶平差作業方式,達成結合DGPS及PPP兩種解算點雲之成果。 |
英文摘要 | The positioning accuracy of airborne LiDAR point clouds is mainly originated from GPS positioning. In general, DGPS method is used in Taiwan for solving the position of GPS rover on the air-plane with a ground base station within 20 km. However, part of the high mountains in Taiwan is inaccessible, where suitable site for installing ground reference stations is almost impossible. It is important to know the potential of applying Precise Point Positioning(PPP). PPP by using IGS GPS satellite precise ephemeris and clock anywhere in the world can achieve real-time or post processing for high-precision positioning. In this study, a test is carried out by using both conventional DGPS and PPP methods for a block of 6 selected flight strips of LiDAR scans. Results of LAS data generated by both methods are compared by the TIMESTAMP of point clouds for both before and after strip adjustment. In addition, results of adjustment of strips combined from both DGPS and PPP are compared with those of all strips of DGPS and, thus, to understand the possibility of using PPP instead of DGPS for the area not accessible for installing continuous GPS stations. It is concluded that though there is a datum difference between DGPS and PPP, strips of point clouds generated by PPP can be effectively merged into strip adjustment combining both strips of point clouds by DGPS and PPP. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。