查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 趙翼史學「斷限」觀念述評--以魏晉南北朝史書為中心
- 趙翼經世致用的史學思想研究
- 後現代主義與經典詮釋
- 趙翼論詩詩評析
- 從趙翼「甌北詩話」論李白樂府詩之對偶
- 司馬遷之心--〈報任少卿書〉析論
- 蔣心餘與袁枚、趙翼及江西文人交遊
- 趙翼曾否反對引用野史糾駁正史問題平議
- The Religious Inclinations of Ch'ing Kao-tsung[清高宗] and Three Foremost Poets during His Reign: Yuan Mei[袁枚], Chiang Shih-chuan[蔣士銓], and Chao I[趙翼]
- 綜論趙翼確為「廿二史箚記」及「陔餘叢考」之作者
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 趙翼史學「斷限」觀念述評--以魏晉南北朝史書為中心=Criticism on "Duan Hsien" of Chao Yi's History: Based on History Books of Wei, Jin and North-South Dynasties |
---|---|
作者 | 柯璟霖; Ko, Ching-lin; |
期刊 | 東吳中文線上學術論文 |
出版日期 | 20140600 |
卷期 | 26 2014.06[民103.06] |
頁次 | 頁77-95 |
分類號 | 610.83 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 一人二史; 斷限; 趙翼; 西魏書; 謝啟昆; One person, two histories; Duan Hsien; Chao Yi; West Wei book; Hsieh Chi-kun; |
中文摘要 | 自唐代史學家劉知幾提倡斷代史,主張史書應具有「斷限」觀念之後,歷代正史著作,多遵守此觀念,將跨越時代的人物歸入後朝的史書。清代史學家趙翼整理魏晉時期史書後,於其著作《廿二史劄記》則提出了不同的看法:為了說明事蹟之始末或是表揚氣節,史家對跨時代的人物,即使之前史書已有著錄,在編寫正史之時可以彈性的予以「一人二史」。因此「一人二史」屬於趙翼不同於清代史學家的歷史編纂理念。 |
英文摘要 | In Tang Dynasty, the historian Liu Chi-ji initiated divisional history and suggested the concept of "Duan Hsien" in history books. Thus, books of authorized history have followed the concept and they allocated the characters in different times in history books of the following dynasties. In Ching Dynasty, the historian Chao Yi reorganized history books of Wei and Jin Period, and proposed different view in his The Notebook of Twenty-Two Histories: in order to describe the origin of the events or praise the sprit, regarding the characters in different times, even though recorded in previous history books, the historians editing authorized history can develop flexible "one person, two histories". Thus, "one person, two histories" is Chao Yi’s editing concept of history different from historians in Ching Dynasty. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。