查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 「次承攬人」作為民法第五一三條抵押權權利主體之探討--比較法上之分析
- 保險人之告知或通知義務--臺灣高雄地方法院82年保險字第16號判決評析
- 論保險事故發生後之通知義務--兼評最高法院八十五年度臺上字第二一四五號判決
- 論人身保險契約重複投保時之通知義務或告知義務--評最高法院八十七年度臺上字第一六六六號判決
- 論人事保證之從屬性與債權人之附隨注意義務--兼評民法債編關於「人事保證」之增訂條文
- 建築工程承攬瑕疵擔保責任之探討
- 論不完全給付與物之瑕疵擔保競合--以「檢查通知義務」、「除斥期間」之遵守為中心
- 買受人違反暫為保管、變賣及通知義務之效力
- 論保險事故發生後之通知義務--兼論違反保險法第五十八條通知義務之法律效果
- 論承攬人抵押權暨登記實務
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 「次承攬人」作為民法第五一三條抵押權權利主體之探討--比較法上之分析=A Study on the "Subcontractor" as the Subject of the Lien by Article 513 of the Civil Code-- An Analysis of Comparative Law |
---|---|
作者 | 黃健彰; Huang, Chien-chang; |
期刊 | 東海大學法學研究 |
出版日期 | 20101200 |
卷期 | 33 2010.12[民99.12] |
頁次 | 頁125-165 |
分類號 | 584.388、584.388 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 承攬人抵押權; 次承攬人; 紐約系統; 賓夕凡尼亞系統; 通知義務; 拋棄抵押權; Mechanic's lien; Subcontractor; New York system; Pennsylvania system; Duty of notice; Release of mortgage; |
中文摘要 | 對承攬人抵押權的主體言,既然次承攬人通常為承攬工作實際執行的人,故次承攬人應有主張民法第513條抵押權的可能。當承攬人未支付次承攬人報酬時,如次承攬人將來欲主張抵押權,應課予次承攬人「即時通知定作人」的義務,使定作人知悉「承攬人未支付次承攬人報酬,次承攬人可能對工作所附的定作人不動產主張抵押權」。次承攬人通知定作人後,定作人嗣後須支付承攬人的報酬數額,得扣除承攬人未支付次承攬人的報酬數額,即可使定作人免於雙重給付的危險。承攬人向定作人請求報酬時,承攬人應證明其已支付每一個次承攬人報酬,或提出每一個次承攬人都拋棄抵押權的聲明書。如有該聲明書,定作人即可免於次承攬人對其抵押權的主張,這也是使定作人免於雙重給付危險的方式。 |
英文摘要 | As far as subject of mechanic's lien is concerned, since the subcontractor is usually the practical implementation of contracted work, he should be given the right to claim mechanic's lien by Article 513 of the Civil Code.If the contractor does not pay the subcontractor the remuneration and the subcontractor wants to foreclose in the future, the subcontractor is obliged to ”provide a notice to inform the proprietor immediately” to make the proprietor aware that ”the contractor does not pay the subcontractor the remuneration, and the subcontractor may foreclose the estate of the proprietor which the hire of work is done on.” After the subcontractor informs the proprietor, the proprietor may deduct the unpaid amount of the remuneration when he pays the contractor the remuneration so that he can avoid the danger of double payment.When the contractor demands the remuneration from the proprietor, he should ”demonstrate that each subcontractor has been paid” or ”give to the proprietor a signed release of lien from each subcontractor.” According to the release, the proprietor can be exempted from the subcontractor claiming his lien. This is a way to make the proprietor from the danger of double payment. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。