查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 臺灣理論與知識生產:以一九九○年代臺灣後殖民與酷兒論述為分析對象
- 制約中國大陸學術思想界的幾個問題
- 對布迪厄社會學知識進展的考察
- 圖書館在知識產生過程中的角色
- 臺灣學術場域的知識生產、傳播與消費--人文社會科學的學術出版分析
- The Knowledge Production of Political Behavior Study: A Content Analysis for American Political Science Review (1967-1986)
- 臺灣性別與情感教育研究之回顧分析:知識生產的挑戰與展望
- 作為歷史進行式的檔案、創作與知識生產(下)
- 當我/們同在一起:亞美邊緣的聯結想像
- 文化認同與知識生產的地方性:來自前現代領域的觀察
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 臺灣理論與知識生產:以一九九○年代臺灣後殖民與酷兒論述為分析對象=Taiwan Theory and Knowledge Production: A Case Study on Taiwan's Postcolonial and Queer Discourses in the 1990s |
---|---|
作者 | 劉亮雅; Liou, Liang-ya; |
期刊 | 臺灣文學研究集刊 |
出版日期 | 20150800 |
卷期 | 18 2015.08[民104.08] |
頁次 | 頁45-81 |
分類號 | 544.71 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 臺灣理論; 知識生產; 臺灣後殖民理論; 臺灣酷兒理論; Taiwan theory; Knowledge production; Taiwan's postcolonial theories; Taiwan's queer theories; |
中文摘要 | 臺灣快速轉譯、援用西方理論,從後現代、後殖民、精神分析、酷 兒、女性主義、現代性、全球化理論等等不一而足。但如同陳瑞麟指 出,臺灣很少討論對西方理論的風格化應用能否形成自己的理論家族、 理論系譜?能否被國際學界看到?本文認為另一個重點應放在理論如何 被轉譯、挪用、再生產?如何被接合到臺灣既有的論述(也是某種理 論)?在知識生產過程中有無誤用、濫用或不足之處?在解嚴前後,理 論被接受,通常是因其具有挑戰體制、重新詮釋過去、開展未來的進步 性,但不同的脈絡與政經社會條件下,理論援用的適切性仍需要被檢 視。本文以一九九○年代臺灣後殖民與酷兒論述為分析對象,探討臺灣 理論與知識生產。我將藉由討論兩種論述各自內部的論戰與發展以及兩 者之間的交鋒,一方面探討在當時臺灣的脈絡下後殖民與酷兒理論援用 的適切性,另方面討論臺灣所形成的後殖民與酷兒理論家族。 |
英文摘要 | In Taiwan, western theories such as postmodernism, postcolonial theory, psychoanalysis, queer theory, feminist theory, theory of modernity, and theory of globalization have been rapidly translated and appropriated. But as R. L. Chen points out, we rarely discuss whether stylized application or assemblage of western theories has formed a family or genealogy of theories, and whether such a family has become visible in the international academia. This article argues that, in addition to Chen’s concern, we should also pay attention to how theories are translated, appropriated, and reproduced, how they are grafted onto existing discourses (also a kind of theories) in Taiwan, and whether there is misuse or inadequate application of theories in the process of knowledge production. Around the time of the end of martial rule in 1987, theories were often accepted because of their progressiveness in challenging the institutions, offering possibilities of reinterpreting the past, and opening up a new future. Nevertheless, we still need to look into the appropriateness of the application of theories, given the differences in historical context and socio-political and economic conditions. Using Taiwan’s postcolonial and queer discourses in the 1990s as a case study, this article examines Taiwan theory in relation to knowledge production. By probing into the internal debates and development of both discourses as well as the tension between them, I dwell on the appropriateness of the application of western theories in the Taiwanese context on the one hand, and how a family of Taiwan’s postcolonial and queer theories has emerged on the other. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。