查詢結果分析
相關文獻
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 族群正義與族群政治--以R. v. Marshall為例=Group Justice and Group Politics: R. v. Marshall |
---|---|
作者 | 陳張培倫; Tunkan Tansikian; |
期刊 | 臺灣國際研究季刊 |
出版日期 | 20110300 |
卷期 | 7:1 2011.春[民100.春] |
頁次 | 頁35-58 |
分類號 | 536.53 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 族群正義; 歷史正義; 分配正義; 原住民族; R. v. Marshall; Group justice; Historical justice; Distributive justice; Indigenous people; |
中文摘要 | 加拿大最高法院對R. v. Marshall一案的判決,藉由承認歷史條約內容,確認了Mi'kmaq族擁有商業捕撈的權利,但為了保育與其它正當目的,判決同時也主張政府仍有權進行必要之限制。本文試圖指出,雖然在該判決的後續影響與政府處理步驟上仍有爭議,但此判決對族群正義的實踐有其意義,一方面它意涵著歷史正義之具現,國家與主流族群不應迴避原屬原住民族的權利,另一方面它也標誌著大社會應認真思索如何實現歷史正義權利與保障當下分配正義間的平衡問題,方能促進族群間的平等地位。 |
英文摘要 | In the decision of R. v. Marshall, the Supreme Court of Canada admitted that the historical agreement to be effective nowadays, and that the Mi'kmaq bands still hold the right to fishing for commercial profits. This paper argues that, although there are some disputes about the decision's influence and government's response, it is a milestone for improving group justice. On the one hand, the country acknowledges indigenous rights on the historical documents; on the other hand, it gives an impetus to the whole society to deliberate how to equilibrate the claims from historical justice and the claims from distributive justice. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。