查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Experience of Implementing WHO-International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in Disability Welfare Policy in Taiwan
- 從服務使用者觀點探討身心障礙者鑑定與需求評估制度流程之研究
- 活動參與功能評估對臺灣身心障礙者鑑定系統之意義與衝擊
- 推動身心障礙福利機構邁向健康促進照護機構理論實踐--以新北市春暉啟能中心為例
- 國際健康功能與障礙分類(ICF)系統專業團隊評估模式應用:分類一致性探討
- 世界衛生組織「國際功能、身心障礙與健康分類系統(ICF)規劃與推動」架構之認知態度調查
- 身心障礙者自我決策與自我擁護--障礙者社會福利與特殊教育新議題與趨勢
- 重視身心障礙者在職訓練促進其就業適應與自立
- 身心障礙者社區照顧模式--以文山區心智障礙者社區照顧為例
- 臺北市身心障礙者臨時及短期照顧服務的回顧與展望
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Experience of Implementing WHO-International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in Disability Welfare Policy in Taiwan=應用世界衛生組織-國際健康功能與身心障礙分類系統(WHO-ICF)作為臺灣身心障礙者鑑定初探研究 |
---|---|
作者 | 嚴嘉楓; 林佳靜; 廖華芳; 陳適卿; 林靖瑛; 邱弘毅; 劉燦宏; Yen, Chia-feng; Lin, Chia-chin; Liao, Hua-fang; Chen, Shih-ching; Lin, Ching-ying; Chiu, Hung-yi; Liou, Tsan-hon; |
期刊 | 身心障礙研究 |
出版日期 | 20120300 |
卷期 | 10:1 2012.03[民101.03] |
頁次 | 頁1-19 |
分類號 | 548.2 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 世界衛生組織; 身心障礙者; 身心障礙者鑑定; 國際健康功能及身心障礙分類系統; Disability; Disability welfare policy; International classification of functioning; Disability and health; ICF; World Health Organization; |
中文摘要 | 目的:本研究旨在說明如何應用「國際健康功能與身心障礙(ICF)分類」系統設計出台灣身心障礙鑑定工具及需求評估制度。研究方法:本研究以專家決策過程(decision-making process)為主要研究方式,資料收集期間為2008-2010年。參與專家共計199位,根據其專長並依ICF架構分成16組,各組以焦點團體及德菲法,針對未來評估方法、標準及評估人員資格等進行研議及決策。結果:(一)以ICF 整合模式取代長久以來身心障礙者鑑定之醫療模式,並設計兩階段鑑定評估來界定身心障礙者;(二)階段性完成身心障礙者鑑定之流程、標準及工具,並初步決議從ICF 2480位碼中,挑選出137個做為台灣障礙者鑑定核心碼;(三)本研究從研議過程中歸納出對醫療體系、中央、地方政府與身心障礙者及其家屬四方面的衝擊。結論:WHO已針對許多疾病發展出核心編碼,但皆無法應用於身心障礙者鑑定,所以如何從ICF分類系統或架構中發展適合台灣障礙者鑑定之用的題項是格外重要與創新,惟本研究結果還需要鑑定實驗計畫來驗證工具的可行性。 |
英文摘要 | Objectives: The objective of this study is to demonstrate the process of applying WHO-ICF in Taiwan. Methods: We initiated a national decision-making process involving members of Taiwan's ICF Project Team. A total of 199 professionals participated in one of 16 groups which were according to the ICF framework. In each group, one member led the discussion in the form of a focus group session, using voting to reach agreement. These groups were asked to develop evaluation methods and standards, and to formulate related courses to train disability assessment workers. Each group discussed and drafted related regulations. Results: We completed the phased to replace the integration model for medical model to define people with disability using WHO-ICF in Taiwan and design two stages for definition of people with disability during 2008-2010. The project has now completed several parts of the standards, tools, and practice manuals based on the ICF. We selected a total of 137 out of all ICF codes for disability assessment from total 2480 codes. Lastly, we found dilemmas and impacts in four aspects which are hospitals, local and central government, people with disabilities and the main caregiver. Conclusions: Several core sets developed by WHO are mainly for diseases and not applicable to disability assessment. Therefore it is vitally important to select more applicable items from ICF related categories targeted at determining disability eligibility, but the new assessment protocols and tools need to be tested and observed in the future. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。