查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 從行政法發展的背景看行政訴訟的任務與功能變遷=Changes in the Tasks and Functions of the Administrative Jurisdiction under the Back-ground of the Administrative Law Development |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳英鈐; | 書刊名 | 政大法學評論 |
卷 期 | 72 2002.12[民91.12] |
頁 次 | 頁333-370 |
分類號 | 588.16 |
關鍵詞 | 有效權利保護; 訴權; 效率取向; 司法預算; 新操控模式; 非正式行為; 行政法秩序生態化; 行政法秩序國際化; 程序思考; 法庭外的紛爭解決; 責任分配之法釋義學; 魔術四角; 主觀權利; 行政決定之審查; 客觀法秩序; 民營化; 公示化; 民營化結果法制; 保證責任; 強制獨任法官; Law-supplementing rule-making; Resource scarcity; Organization structures; Procedure structures; Functional equilibrium; Efficiency principiple; Privatization; Ecologicalisation; Internationalization; Procedural correctness; Substantive correctness; Reform of the administrative jurisdiction; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 1.行政法院已經證明其為基本法國家性之核心要素:長久以來,在立法國家中,法院有其特殊地位,對於渾沌不明的法律規定加以體系協調,並填補開放的法律構成要件具乃法院不可放棄之任務。簡而言之,法院擔任補充法律規定之造法角色。 司法審級結構乃根據「嘗試與錯誤」(trial and error) 原則所建構,訴訟程序相較於一般之立法行為很明顯的通常較適合解決社會衝突。基此理由,以及經濟、環境,和擔任公共服務資源之有限性,未來對於司法給付之需求仍將居高不下。 2.對組織及程序結構做大幅的變革,從目前之處境來看,相當令人懷疑。尤其在第六次之行政訴訟法修正後,立法活動應該無為而治一段期間。新規定應當透過謹慎之法院實務予以整合,而不是以黑白二分法斷然予以拒絕。 3.無論如何,廣泛之立法重塑計畫須遵守具體之功能相當原則,並依據可靠之基本立場,確實之分析以及可檢驗之總體評價。 4.對於司法之特殊效率原則 (質的決定以及量的評價) 要求,不能以憲法判決加以反對。此原則之個別問題必須透過行政法院與其他機關間的對話,尤其是與審計部之間,共同合作予以解決。 5.尤其是行政法院應秉持著對於國家性質之深度轉變過程的理解,掌握司法之重大實質任務,而此係與民營化、生態化以及國際化息息相關。法院必須有體系地發展出解決對策,特別是經由擴大訴權範圍,以及確定行政決定之程序與實體正確性關係,對於司法救濟程序進一步開放。 6.總而言之,闡於行政法院改革之討論,必須從現有狹隘的數量化思考,盡快地改弦更張,以改善品質為目標。有鑑於龐大之任務以及令人振奮之挑戰,法官不能消極以對。 |
英文摘要 | 1.It has been proved, that the Administrative Courts constitutes one core element of constitutional democracy: In the legislative state of current shape, the courts have for a long time taken on the indispensable tasks, to harmonize the unclear legal text, in short: law-supplementing rule-making. Court procedures, arranged in different instances according to the principle of trial and error, are often recognizably more suit-able to solve social conflicts than general legislative acts. Therefore, and for the reason of resource scarcity in terms of economics, environment, and public service, the demand for legal services of the courts will in the future also be high. 2.Large scale cuts in the organization and procedure structures are, in the present situation, of doubtful value. Particularly, after the 6. VwGO novella, a time of legislative peace must come back. The new regulations should, instead of being rejected by a straight-ahead, black-and-white brush, be integrated through careful practice into the court's everyday life. 3.More far-reaching legislative reform projects must in any case conform to the maxim of concrete functional equilibrium. They have to be built on reliable evaluation, accurate analyses and comprehensive assessment. 4.The requirements of a legally specific articulated efficiency principle in terms of quality regulation and quality appraisal cannot be objected by constitutional verdicts. Detailed points of such a principle are to be worked out by the cooperation between Administrative Courts and other bodies, e.g. the audit offices. 5.However, the Administrative Courts should above all, with understanding of the deeper processes of change in the construction of the state, carry out its especially significant tasks of the jurisdiction, which arises together from the privatization, ecologicalisation and the internationalization. Systematically developed solutions are necessary, particularly in dealing with the questions of a further opening up of the access to the courts by extending standing, and with the coordinated relation- ship between procedural and substantive correctness of the administrative decisions. 6.Altogether the discussions around the reform of the administrative jurisdiction should be changed over, as quickly as possible, from focusing on the quantity criteria, to quality goal. In view of these huge tasks and interesting challenges, there is no place for a passive attitude on the part of the judges! |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。