查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 論「事事無礙」與「主伴圓融」的差異--談華嚴四祖澄觀與三祖法藏的法脈問題=The Difference between "Everything Unobstructive" and "Main and Associate Theory"--To Discuss How Did Cheng-guan Inherit Fa-tzang's Philosophy |
---|---|
作者 | 林建勳; Lin, Chien-hsun; |
期刊 | 應華學報 |
出版日期 | 20120500 |
卷期 | 10 2012.05[民101.05] |
頁次 | 頁33-67 |
分類號 | 226.3 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 法藏; 澄觀; 本圓; 後圓; 事事無礙; 主伴圓融; Fa-tzan; Cheng-guan; Hua-yen Discipline; Tathāgatagarbha; |
中文摘要 | 本論文旨在論述華嚴三祖法藏與四祖澄觀間法脈相承的一些問題,文中將澄觀的圓教觀總結在「事事無礙」上,將法藏的圓教觀總結在「主伴圓融」上,透過對這兩個觀念的探討與釐清,顯出澄觀與法藏的不同,進一步說明兩人不同的判教格局。澄觀將其圓教的骨幹放在終教上,這與法藏的華嚴一乘圓教是不一樣的。也因此澄觀認為同教與別教同屬圓教,以及三教(終、頓、圓)圓融即是圓教,這些觀點都不是法藏所能同意。澄觀對華嚴判教的改造,使得澄觀後的華嚴學展現出不一樣的姿態。這也是極力以力挽華嚴宗學為己任的澄觀所始料未及的吧! |
英文摘要 | The major purpose of this paper is to found the differences out between Cheng-guan's(澄觀) and Fa-tzang's(法藏) philosophy. Fa-tzang is regarded as third-master of Hwa-yen Discipline(華嚴宗), and Cheng-guan fourth-master, in Chinese history. Cheng-guan's philosophy comes to an conclusion, ”Everything Unobstructive”(事事無礙), but Fa-tzang's inference is ”Main and the Associate theory”(主伴圓融). The fundamental theory of Cheng-guan's philosophy is tathagatagarbha(如來藏) thoughts, but Fa-tzang's is not. These differences led to the situation that Cheng-guan's philosophy is entirely different from Fa-tzang, although both of them are regarded as Hwa-yen Discipline masters. Cheng-guan have transformed Fa-tzang's philosophy to his own modus, and influenced the development and followers of Hwa-yen Buddhism later in ancient China. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。