查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 虛擬社群線上行為模式之實證研究--線性結構模式之交叉效度檢定=An Empirical Research into the Online Behavior Model in a Virtual Community--The Case of Cross Validation in Causal Modeling |
---|---|
作者 | 余泰魁; Yu, Tai-kuei; |
期刊 | 交大管理學報 |
出版日期 | 20050600 |
卷期 | 25:1 2005.06[民94.06] |
頁次 | 頁67-95 |
分類號 | 448.6 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 虛擬社群; 結構方程式模型; 交叉效度; Virtual community; Structural equation modeling; Cross validity; |
中文摘要 | 隨著網路科技的普及,網路使用者的技術門檻需求大幅降低,改變傳統的人際關係溝通模式,形成許多新的網路社群。虛擬社群經營者必需滿網友間的互動,網友於社群間和他人溝通獲得滿足,進而加深其參與懷度,社群經營者要如格吸引人潮、留住人潮也格外值得我們思考。本研究提出一「虛擬社群線上行為模式」因果模式,採問卷調查模式以臺南市東區網咖店為樣本母體,有問卷回收516份,並亂數分類成二組樣本資料,經結構化方程式模型建構與實證,並得致下研究結果:(1)研究模式中各潛在依變項對整體模式的變異解釋力(R2)分別為:行為(0.881)、行為傾向(0.386)、態度(0.691),顯示本研究所提的修正計畫行為模式在關係型虛擬社群,為一可接受的模式。(2)在雙交叉驗証方面,以基準樣本為基礎模式時交叉效度指標(Cross validation index, CVI)為10.87,落在顯著水準α=0.05信賴區間910.13~11.64)中;反之,以校準樣本為基礎模式時交叉效度指標為8.32,落度,研究量表與研究模式之接受性相當高。 |
英文摘要 | With the simplification of internet technology, the technical requirements necessary for internet users have drastically declined. This has changed the traditional communication model of interpersonal relationships and created many internet communities. A virtual community had to satisfy the desire for interaction among its visitors, fulfill their needs to communicate with others in the community and furthermore deepen their degree of participation. How a virtual community attracts and keeps its visitors is worth pondering. This study presents a causal model of “the online behavior model in a virtual community.” The questionnaires were filled out at internet cafes located in the east district of Tainan, 516 valid of questionnaires were returned and were divided into two groups according to random numbers. Through structural equation modeling, the results came out as follows: (1)In the research model, the variation R2 of each latent dependent variable to the attitude (0.691) respectively, which shows that the revised theory of planned behavior is a acceptable model in the relevant online virtual community. (2)In respect of the double cross test, the cross valuation index (CVI) read as 10.87 and fell between a significant level (α=0.05) and a confidence interval (10.13~11.64) when the calibration sample was taken as the basic model; conversely, the cross validation index (CVI) read as 8.32 and fell between a significant level (α=0.05) and a confidence interval (7.77~8.89) as the validation sample was the basic model. The two sets of samples present cross validity; the research questionnaire and model are highly acceptable. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。