查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Landlord Awareness of and Willingness to Participate in a Green Forestation Plan: The Case of Tainan County
- 明清地主制研究的新趨向
- 國際移轉計價決策制定型態影響因素之研究--臺灣企業之實證分析
- 地主與建設公司合建型態與稅賦分析
- 近現代東亞土地制度演變的基本軌迹--從地主所有制到現代小農制
- 地主國特性與自創國際品牌績效之關係研究--以臺灣廠商為例
- 清代汐止地區的拓墾與地主菁英階層的發展
- 地主國文化差異因素對跨國服務業公司海外市場進入策略選擇影響之初探--臺灣地區國際衛星頻道業者之實證
- 論都市計劃過程中民眾利益組成與位置改變:由高雄市內惟埤文化園區特定區計畫剖析民眾參與的本質
- 臺灣企業對外直接投資與產業空洞化之探討
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Landlord Awareness of and Willingness to Participate in a Green Forestation Plan: The Case of Tainan County=地主對綠色造林計畫之參與意願與政策認知--以臺南縣為例 |
---|---|
作者 | 柳婉郁; 林俊成; Liu, Wan-yu; Lin, Jiunn-cheng; |
期刊 | 臺灣林業科學 |
出版日期 | 20110600 |
卷期 | 26:2 2011.06[民100.06] |
頁次 | 頁113-124 |
分類號 | 436.2 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 綠色造林計畫; 地主; 參與意願; Green forestation plan; GFP; Landlord; Willingness to participate; |
中文摘要 | 台灣在2009年開始實施的綠色造林計畫,預計在前8年推動平地造林6萬公頃,每公頃每年補助12萬元,20年合計240萬元。本研究針對地主對於綠色造林計畫之看法進行問卷統計分析,以探討地主對於綠色造林計畫之參與誘因、對政策設計之重視與同意程度及相關看法,期能建議相關配套措施提昇綠色造林計畫之政策實施效益。本研究結果顯示:農地地主不知道政府實施綠色造林計畫之比例偏高;在高造林獎勵金的政策下,有五成以上的農地地主之參與意願為普通,約莫三成則不願意參與。在參與造林期間方面,受訪者中有52.7%認為最合理規劃之參與造林期間應下降至15年以下。在補助金額方面,受訪者中有41.7%認為最合理規劃之補助金額應提高為每年每公頃25萬元左右。本研究結果提出政策建議如下:(1)尚有許多農民仍然不知道有綠色造林計畫,故政府在政策推廣方面,仍需多方面加強。(2)許多人不參加綠色造林計畫主因為沒有足夠的農地面積,故政府對於農地面積之限制可酌量調整。(3)未來在推廣綠色造林計畫方面,政府可鎖定高收入、高學歷者加強政策推廣。(4)未來政府規劃其餘造林之營收效益,使造林政策除了有獎勵金,另有其他經濟效益以便提高參與造林之誘因,獎勵金之提供對於農地地主幫助有限。 |
英文摘要 | A green forestation plan (GFP) is expected to promote the reforestation of plains totaling 60,000 ha within the first 8 yr in Taiwan. Annual subsidies for landlords, is NT$120,000 (US$ 4,000) per hectare, and NT$2.4 million for 20 yr. In this paper, we surveyed landlords' opinions towards the GFP in an attempt to understand their incentives to participate in the GFP and their levels of concern and agreement towards the policy design. According to the results of this paper, there was still a relatively high proportion of respondents who were not aware of the GFP; more than 50% of landlords were neutral or willing to participate given high reforestation subsidies; approximately 30% of landlords were unwilling to participate. In terms of the period of this policy, 52.7% of respondents indicated that it should be shortened to ≦ 15 yr. In terms of the amount of the subsidy, 41.7% of respondents said that it should be raised to approximately NT$250,000/ha. Some policy suggestions are provided as follows: (1) many landlords are still unaware of the GFP so the government should enhance the promotion of the policy; (2) many landlords are unwilling to participate in GFP mainly because they do not own enough land to be eligible, hence the government should consider adjusting its requirements for the minimum agricultural land area; (3) for subsequent promotions of the GFP, the government may consider targeting landlords with high incomes and high levels of education; and (4) because the subsidy of this policy alone provides limited help to landlords, the government should help landlords explore other revenue possibilities from afforestation in addition to the existing subsidies and raise the participation incentives. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。