查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 憲政體制與選舉制度的配套思考
- 憲政體制、選舉制度、選舉時程與政府型態--臺灣的個案分析
- 選舉制度及時程對政黨體系與政府型態的影響:總統制與半總統制國家的跨國分析
- 「制度論」而非「制度決定論」--我國憲政體制與選舉制度的再思考
- 多黨架構下的選舉合作
- Electoral System, Voter Preferences, and The Fragmentation of Party System: The East Asian Cases
- 政黨體系理論中的「過度確定」問題--結構、制度、策略及文化
- 憲政體制與政黨體系關聯性之研究--兼論我國政黨體系的發展
- 憲政體制、政黨政治與選舉制度
- 憲政體制、選舉制度與政黨運作
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 憲政體制與選舉制度的配套思考=An Analytical Framework for Combining the Constitutional System with the Electoral System |
---|---|
作者 | 蘇子喬; Su, Tzu-chiao; |
期刊 | 政治科學論叢 |
出版日期 | 20100600 |
卷期 | 44 2010.06[民99.06] |
頁次 | 頁35-74 |
分類號 | 571.6 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 憲政體制; 選舉制度; 政黨體系; 政府型態; Constitutional system; Electoral system; Party system; The form of government; |
中文摘要 | 憲政體制與選舉制度的優劣無疑是政治制度研究的重要議題。然而,論者經常是將這兩個議題彼此切割,單獨探討各種憲政體制或選舉制度的優缺點。本文強調,憲政體制與選舉制度這兩種政治制度應該搭配在一起進行觀察,才有可能明確判斷一個國家究竟應採何種憲政體制和選舉制度較適宜。由於不同的選舉制度會塑造不同的政黨體系,不同的政黨體系與憲政體制搭配在一起會組合成不同的政府型態,而不同的政府型態則會各自展現出正面與負面的政治效應,因此本文即是以「憲政體制」、「選舉制度」、「政黨體系」、「政府型態」四個變項所形成的分析架構為基礎,探討不同憲政體制與選舉制度搭配下所可能造成的利弊得失,並對未來台灣在憲政體制與選舉制度的制度選擇提出粗淺的建議。就台灣的憲政體制走向而言,假若台灣未來的憲政體制將走向總統制,在立委選舉制度上應避免採取比例代表制或聯立制,以避免陷入政治僵局;假若台灣未來的憲政體制仍維持雙首長制,而立委選舉制度擬採取比例代表制或聯立制,則應設定政黨可分配席次門檻,以防止小黨林立造成政治不穩定,同時也應賦予立法院閣揆同意權,以避免出現缺乏施政效率的少數政府。 |
英文摘要 | The contrasting impacts of different constitutional and electoral systems are undoubtedly important issues in the research of political institutions. Existing studies usually consider the advantages and disadvantages of each constitutional or electoral system separately, and ignore the fact that the two systems are in fact embedded together. This paper argues that the most appropriate constitutional and electoral system for a country can be discovered only when the two systems are considered together. Each electoral system produces a different party system, and each combination of party system and constitutional system also brings about a different form of government with its own positive and negative political effects. This paper investigates the strengths and weaknesses of different combinations of constitutional and electoral systems on the basis of an analytical framework consisting of four variables: the constitutional system, the electoral system, the party system and the form of government. Based on this framework, the paper also makes some suggestions regarding Taiwan’s constitutional and electoral reforms in the future. If Taiwan’s constitutional system moves towards presidentialism, in order to prevent political deadlock the legislature should not adopt a proportional representation system or compensatory two-vote system. If Taiwan retains a semi-presidential system and a proportional representation system or compensatory two-vote system is adopted for legislative elections, then a minimum vote threshold should be put in place to prevent the emergence of an atomized multi-party system, which may result in political instability. At the same time, the Legislative Yuan should be granted the power to approve nominations for the position of premier in order to guard against the emergence of inefficient minority government. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。