查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 國內公立療養院職能治療部門對精神分裂病患評估量表的使用狀況及心理計量特性探討
- 國內醫學中心職能治療部門對中風病患評估量表的使用狀況與建議
- 醫學中心物理治療部門對中風病患使用的評估量表之心理計量特性
- 中風病人姿勢控制評估量表之心理計量特性
- Development of a Performance Scale for Nurses in Community-Based Long-Term Care Facilities in Taiwan
- 客觀結構式臨床測驗檢核表信效度之建立--以腦中風個案之布朗斯壯動作能力三和四級評量為例
- 常用視知覺評估工具之心理計量特性回顧
- 常用於失智症患者之記憶測驗及心理計量特性回顧
- 修改後健康信念模式測量理論基礎之探討--以青少年無照騎車之研究為例
- 盧一尼神經心理測驗組中文修訂版的信效度研究
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 國內公立療養院職能治療部門對精神分裂病患評估量表的使用狀況及心理計量特性探討=Utilization and Psychometric Properties of the Assessment Tools for Schizophrenia at the Department of Occupational Therapy in the Public Psychiatric Centers in Taiwan |
---|---|
作者 | 吳希文; 王勝輝; 李秉家; 謝清麟; 李柏森; Wu, Hsi-wen; Wang, Sheng-hui; Li, Ping-chia; Hsieh, Ching-lin; Lee, Posen; |
期刊 | 臺灣職能治療研究與實務雜誌 |
出版日期 | 20100600 |
卷期 | 6:1 2010.06[民99.06] |
頁次 | 頁25-36 |
分類號 | 415.97 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 評估工具; 信度; 效度; 反應性; 職能治療; Assessment tools; Validity; Reliability; Responsiveness; Occupational therapy; |
中文摘要 | 目的:瞭解目前國內公立療養院使用於精神分裂病患之職能治療評估工具其心理計量特性及實務上使用的時機。方法:以8所公立療養院為對象,收集職能治療部門對精神分裂病患例行性之評估工具及使用時機。工具之心理計量特性以檢索MEDLINE,PsycINFO,CINAHL,及中華民國期刊論文索引系統查證。結果:75%(含)以上單位使用之評估工具共有9項。其中4項評估工具完全缺乏針對精神病患的信度、效度證據。在使用時機方面,大多為視需要使用;然而在結案時很少使用評估工具評量個案。結論:多數臨床常用的評估工具缺乏完整的心理計量驗證,建議加強國內臨床常用評估工具之心理計量特性驗證;此外,在評估時機方面應增加個案結案時之評估,以利掌握個案變化。 |
英文摘要 | Purpose: To investigate the psychometric characteristics and of the clinical measures the timing for using these measures in patients with schizophrenia at the departments of occupational therapy in the public psychiatric centers. Methods: Therapists in 8 public psychiatric centers were surveyed. The assessment tools as well as their timing for using measures in schizophrenic patients at the departments of occupational therapy were investigated. The psychometric characteristics of the assessment tools were investigated through searching the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Chinese Periodical Literature databases. Results: Nine of the assessment tools were used in more than 75% of the public psychiatric centers. Among them, the reliability and validity of 4 assessment tools have not been well established for psychiatric patients. Regarding the timing of using the assessment tools, most of the assessment tools were used for the needs at that time. However, few assessment tools were used to evaluate the patient when discharged. Conclusions: The psychometric characteristics of most assessment tools had not been well established. We therefore suggest that the psychometric characteristics of the assessment tools need to be established. Furthermore, assessments need to be administered when patients were discharged so that the progress of the patients could be well identified. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。