查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 民事訴訟之適時審判與案件管理
- 區域性國際人權法院與內國法之互動--以歐洲人權法院裁判對奧地利刑事法之影響與改造為例
- 監所措施與程序保障--歐洲人權法院相關裁判研究
- 集會及結社自由權:歐洲人權法院判決之分析
- Public Service, Free Expression and European Convention on Human Rights
- 歐洲人權法院--歷史、組織、職權及程序
- The Right to Freedom of Expression and the Protection of Health and Morals--The Jurisprudence of the European Convention on Human Rights
- 論奴隸制度、奴役制度與強迫勞動之禁止:以歐洲人權公約第四條為中心
- 歐洲人權公約之監督機構--國際人權最強而有力之監督者
- 憲法上「公平聽審權」於行政程序中之適用--以歐洲人權公約為中心
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 民事訴訟之適時審判與案件管理=The Right to a Fair Hearing within a Reasonable Time and Case Management |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 沈冠伶; | 書刊名 | 國立臺灣大學法學論叢 |
| 卷 期 | 39:2 2010.06[民99.06] |
| 頁 次 | 頁301-349 |
| 分類號 | 586.1 |
| 關鍵詞 | 適時審判請求權; 案件管理; 法院管理; 有效救濟; 直接審理主義; 集中審理原則; 法定法官原則; 言詞辯論前之準備; 整理並限縮爭點; 歐洲人權法院; 歐洲人權公約; 憲法訴願; 不作為抗告; 損害補償; The right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time; Casemanagement; Court management; An effective remedy; Principle ofimmediacy; Principle of concentration; Principle of legal judge; Identify andnarrow issues; Preparation by preliminary hearing; European court of human rights; European convention on human rights; Constitutional complaint; Special complaint alleging inaction; Action for damages; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 本文討論兩項相關之議題,其一說明適時審判請求權之意涵,並探討違背適時審判請求權之可能救濟途徑;另一則分析在台北及高雄地方法院試辦之案件管理模式。案件管理之目的係為使適時審判請求權受到保障,但將同一民事訴訟事件分為審查庭及審判庭而以二個不同法庭先後進行訴訟程序,恐有違民事訴訟法所採之直接審理原則。各國之案件管理模式不完全相同,固有參考之價值,但不宜脫離我國訴訟制度及民事訴訟法上之基本架構。在我國民事訴訟法之規定下,個案之案件管理與集中審理制度有密切關連,爭點整理程序應由受訴法院進行。關於民事訴訟程序之遲延,我國目前仍然欠缺對於適時審判請求權侵害之有效救濟途徑,參考歐洲人權法院之裁判先例、歐洲國家之立法趨勢以及德國在立法過程之轉向,以事前預防性與事後補償性之救濟併存作為有效之救濟途徑,對於我國應有一定之啟發。 |
| 英文摘要 | This paper has two related purposes. One is to analyse the right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time and remedy for its infringement. The other purpose is to describe and evaluate the recent case management in court praxis of Taiwan. To protect the right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time, Taipei District Court adopts means of case management with which one case is assigned to two judges. But this violates the principle of immediacy in Taiwan’s Code of Civil Procedure. According to this principle, judges who do not participate in the arguments on which a judgment is based may not participate in making the judgment. An effective remedy for protection of rights to a fair hearing within a reasonable time is still lacking in Taiwan law due to lengthy civil proceedings. In view of cases of European Court of Human Rights and German Draft the compensation system shall be considered. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。