查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 通訊監察與民主監督:歐美爭議發展趨勢之反思
- 「目的外利用」個資行為之評價--兼評臺灣臺北地方法院103年度北小字第1360號小額民事判決
- New Technology, New Information Privacy: Social-Value-Oriented Information Privacy Theory
- 警察機關要求私人提供資料協助追蹤監視的法律問題--以調閱電信資料及監視錄影資料為例
- 從美國就巨量資料之管制現況與立法趨勢論我國可能之因應對策
- 昨日法制與今日科技--通訊保障及監察法於網路監察客體適用之探討
- 電信資訊匯流下之法律爭議--以Skype為例
- 科技人權--全民電子通訊監察與個人資料保護
- 美國法上個人資訊隱私權的相關判決
- 網際網路時代個人隱私保衛戰
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 通訊監察與民主監督:歐美爭議發展趨勢之反思=Surveillance and Democratic Supervision--Reflections on Tendencies in Developments in Europe and the United States |
---|---|
作者 | 劉靜怡; Liu, Ching-yi; |
期刊 | 歐美研究 |
出版日期 | 20170300 |
卷期 | 47:1 2017.03[民106.03] |
頁次 | 頁43-106 |
分類號 | 581.2324 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 通訊監察; 資訊隱私; 歐洲人權法院; 後設資料; 巨量資料; Surveillance; Informational privacy; European court of human rights; Metadata; Big data; |
中文摘要 | 本文從民主社會應如何監督政府通訊監察行為出發,檢視歐洲人權法院的相關判決,並與美國相關爭議比較,以探究歐美通訊監察法制爭議之發展趨勢,對我國有何啟示,藉此探討通訊監察法制應有的民主監督形貌。本文認為:歐洲人權法院在資訊隱私權領域已累積豐富的判決,往往決定締約國通訊監察或監控法制的改革。值得注意的是,歐洲人權法院在適用歐洲人權公約第8條規定時,經常把重點放在「依法」的解釋與分析上,而非「民主社會所必需」要件。此一趨勢可能導致締約國僅以內國立法表面回應,民主社會所需的資訊隱私保護架構仍有改進空間。 |
英文摘要 | Pursuing an inquiry into how a democratic society is supposed to monitor government surveillance, this essay examines the attitude of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) towards litigation de-rived from laws on surveillance in European nations, and juxtaposes the findings with relevant disputes in the United States; the purpose of this inquiry is to explore how these traditions might shed light on the situation in Taiwan and how the landscape of democratic supervision is to be shaped under modern surveillance law. This essay argues that the European judiciary is well-experienced in the realm of informa-tional privacy, and that reforms to surveillance law in European na-tions is generally determined by ECtHR case-law. Of particular sig-nificance is the emphasis that the ECtHR lays on the interpretation and analysis of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), specifically the focus on the notion “in accordance with the law” rather than “necessary in a democratic society.” Such tendency might lead to the fact that the State Parties to the ECHR are merely willing to introduce domestic legislation. Accordingly, there is still plenty of room for improvement in the protective framework of informational privacy essential for a democratic society. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。