查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 試探兩岸和解下臺灣參與國際組織之法理基礎=Exploring the Legal Bases of Taiwan's Participation in International Organizations in the Context of 2008 Cross-Strait Rapprochement |
---|---|
作 者 | 黃偉峰; | 書刊名 | 臺灣國際法季刊 |
卷 期 | 5:4 2008.12[民97.12] |
頁 次 | 頁63-94 |
分類號 | 578.12 |
關鍵詞 | 世界衛生大會; 政府採購協定; 一個中國、內外有別; 法理一中; World Health Assembly; Government procurement agreement; One China with internal and external distinctions; De jure one China; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 自從2008年5月國民黨的馬英九政府上台後,推動兩岸快速和解。不但台灣海基會與中國海協會迄今已簽訂涉及經貿往來及司法互助等九項協議,而且台灣亦能以「中華台北」觀察員身分受邀參加世界衛生大會(WHA),並順利加入世界貿易組織(WTO)的政府採購協定(GPA)。馬政府宣稱在上述兩項國際組織的參與中,中華民國主權絲毫未損。然而,事實是否如此呢?本文循兩岸和解的脈絡,試圖探索台灣參與WHA及GPA之可能的法理基礎。本文發現中國政府所給予台灣的「國際空間」,其實是建築在「一個中國、內外有別」的操作模式。即馬政府在國際上不挑戰中國的一中原則,故台灣在名稱、旗歌、身分、權益上有所妥協。中國則在國際文書上尋求法理一中的保障後,允許台灣對內或兩岸間有平等口頭表述的空間。但這種參與等於間接在國際文書上「認諾」法理一中的合法性,故對中華民國主權造成不可回復之傷害。 |
英文摘要 | Since the inauguration of Taiwan's President Ma Ing-jou on 20 May 2008, cross-strait tension has been reduced substantially. Not only have Taiwan and China signed nine agreements regarding cross-strait trade, transportation, and mutual judicial assistance, etc, but Taiwan has been allowed to accede to the WTO's Government Procurement Agreement (GPA) and participate in the World Health Assembly (WHA) as an observer. Ma's government declare that the sovereignty of the Republic of China (ROC) is in no way compromise as a result of Taiwan's participation in the above-mentioned international organizations. Is it true that the ROC's sovereignty remains uncompromised? This paper seeks to explore the legal bases of Taiwan's participation in international organizations in the context of 2008 cross-strait détente. It shows that China's offer to allow Taiwan greater "international space" is based on its framework of "one China, with internal and external distinctions." That is, Ma's government in Taiwan is not to challenge China's "one China principle" in the international arena. In return, China will allow Taiwan's oral interpretation of its ROC sovereign status within the island or across the Taiwan Strait. In operational terms, to safeguard Taiwan's potential deviations from "one China principle," China would seek a legal written re-confirmation of its "one China principle" in international organization where Taiwan's participation is politically arranged. By accepting such a political arrangement, Taiwan in fact commits itself to China's legal framework of the "one China principle" in relevant international organizations. Although Taiwan is now able to participate in international organizations, the legal bases of its participation may irreversibly undermine ROC's sovereignty. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。