查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 論使用警槍之要件=The Requirement of Using Police Handgun |
---|---|
作者 | 陳景發; Chen, Ching-fa; |
期刊 | 法學新論 |
出版日期 | 20090500 |
卷期 | 10 2009.05[民98.05] |
頁次 | 頁19-45 |
分類號 | 575.81 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 警械使用; 最後手段性; 危害射擊; 剝奪攻擊能力; 致命性射擊; Using police weapon; Last alternative; Shoot to prevent damage; Destroy attacking ability; Deadly shooting; |
中文摘要 | 依警械使用條例之規定,警察須在客觀上具備本條例第四、五條所定情事後,始得使用警搶,該二條因屬警槍權限之發動時機與要件規定,故其解釋之寬嚴,攸關適用範圍之廣狹;且警察雖被容許使用警槍,但究竟在何種情況下,得為何種程度之使用,並不明確,完全委由警察依第六條所定比例原則於個案上為具體判斷,徒增現場判斷之困難。本文擬從解釋論觀點出發,探究台灣警槍使用要件規定之應興革之處,同時藉由日本法制之研究,以檢討分析出立法上可供參酌之淺見。 |
英文摘要 | According the Police Weapon Usage Act, Police is allowed to use gun only by meeting the requirement of Article four and five Objectively, Both Articles stipulate the timing and requirement of using police handgun. Therefore, the range of application is much more related to the definition of those two articles. Although police is allowed to use gun by law, the exact timing and degree is not clearly defined. Police on the scene should obey the Article six of "Proportional Alternative rule" It is really difficult to decide case by case. This paper is trying to explain the requirement of using police handgun, and provide some amending suggestions by comparing with related law in Japan. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。