查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 香港中學教學語言政策改革:檢討與批判
- 香港語言教育政策及問題評析
- ENGLISH AS A MEDIUM OF INSTRUCTION:TOWARDS A NEW LANGUAGE POLICY
- ENGLISH AS A MEDIUM OF INSTRUCTION:TOWARDS A NEW LANGUAGE POLICY
- Support Services to Secondary School Teachers in Hong Kong
- A study of the Mental Health Status of Secondary School Students in Hong Kong
- 法律之前人人平等﹖--香港法律語言政策探討
- 香港中學派位的性別歧視訴訟--法律、教育及教育測量上的爭論
- 香港中學生粵語發音問題研究
- 香港中學語文單元教學發展的路向
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 香港中學教學語言政策改革:檢討與批判=Reform on the Medium-of-Instruction Policy of Hong Kong Secondary Schools: Review and Critique |
---|---|
作者 | 曾榮光; Tsang, Wing-kwong; |
期刊 | 教育學報 |
出版日期 | 20050600、20051200 |
卷期 | 33:1/2 民94.夏-冬 |
頁次 | 頁221-243 |
分類號 | 800.33 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 香港; 中學; 教學語言; 語言政策; |
中文摘要 | 2005年2月3日教育統籌委員會公布《檢討中學教學語言及中一派位機制諮詢文件》,引起了教育界之間對中學教學語言政策的不少爭論。為有助對有關議題的理性討論及理解,本文的目標是從較宏觀的視點去重新檢視香港特別行政區中學教學語言政策的本質。據此,本文首先將會重新檢視本港中學教學語言的根本目標,並把它們放置在香港特別行政區這個一國兩制政體、細少開放經濟及後殖民社會的宏觀體系內,以剖析中學教學語言政策目標在本質及結構上存在的矛盾。其次,本文會剖析「檢討工作小組」的政策分析與建議本身在方法取向上的盲點與缺失。第三,本文會進一步質疑工作小組整個政策建議的根本理據基礎。最後,將會提出另一個與工作小組建議不同的具體方案供各方參考。 |
英文摘要 | The Education Commission of Hong Kong issued a consultation document entitled Review of Medium of Instruction for Secondary Schools and Secondary School Places Allocation on 3 February 2005. The document has generated heated debates among different parties concerned. In order to facilitate rational discourse and understanding about the issue, this article intends to approach the issue from a macroscopic standpoint and to examine the essential constituents involved in the medium of instruction (MOI) policy of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR). Accordingly, the article will begin with an examination of the objectives of MOI policy in the HKSAR. These policy objectives will then be set against the context of the political system of “one country, two systems,” a small and open economic system, and the post-colonial social system to analyze the structural contradictions at work in the MOI policy of the HKSAR. Second, the article will reveal the blind spots and faults committed by the Working Group in their policy analysis and design. Third, the article will further question the fundamental rationales underlying the whole proposal of MOI policy put forth by the Working Group. Finally, an alternative proposal will be outlined to serve as a reference for public discussion on the issue. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。