查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 秦漢收律初探=The First Research to the Shou-Laws in Ch'in-Han Dynasty |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳中龍; | 書刊名 | 止善 |
卷 期 | 5 2008.12[民97.12] |
頁 次 | 頁55-80 |
分類號 | 582.1 |
關鍵詞 | 收律; 收孥; 秦漢; Shou-Law; Shou-Nu; Ch'in-Han dynasty; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 漢代親屬連坐有三種,一是夷三族,二是族誅,三是收孥。三種涉及的罪行種類與刑罰的執行內容互不相同。收孥的特色在於連坐的親屬範圍不像夷三族那樣的廣,只限於正犯的妻子與兒女,而且正犯的罪刑也不必然是死刑,而是從完城旦、鬼薪以上到死刑之間。連坐的妻子與兒女也不像夷三族那樣要棄市,族誅那樣要徙邊,而只是將他們沒入官府為收人(官奴婢)。收孥未見於出土資料,但張家山漢律有〈收律〉之名,兩者的關係未見學者討論。收孥最早見於《史記•商君列傳》,商鞅變法時訂下收孥之規定,漢文帝元年(179 B.C.)才遭廢除。睡虎地秦律已有收之規定,爰及漢初已成〈收律〉之篇,故收孥與〈收律〉曾經同時存在。收孥之收者在人,〈收律〉之收者不但有人,還包括家中財物,此收孥與〈收律〉之最大差別。《史記•孝文本紀》記文帝元年廢除收孥,廢除之後是否復行,引起兩方討論。從司法案例所見,終兩漢之世,收孥不再復行。只是魏晉時期,收孥的變相形式在某些規定中出現,這些規定被當時視為重典,希望能夠收到「累其心,使重犯法」的效果。 |
英文摘要 | There are three types of kinfolks which are implicated by law in the Han Dynasty, one is the "yi-sna-zu"夷三族, another is the "zu-zhu"族誅, the last is the "shou-nu"收孥. These types are totally different in their contents. The characteristics of the shou-nu which implicated families are not widespread as the "yi-sna-zu", and it only restricted in the criminal's wife and children but not the whole family. Moreover, the criminal won't put to death in every case, but between "wan-cheng-dan"完城旦 and "gui-xin"鬼薪 to the death. The implication to the wife and children are not like the "yi-sna-zu" which would be killed, and also not like the "zu-jia" which would be move to the frontier, but confiscated by the government. It was unable to know when the "shou-nu" began, but it was definitely that the "shou-nu" was never used after the Emperor Wen abolished it. Only in Wei-Jin period, the "shou-nu" appeared in some laws but in different forms. And was believed that it was a stern law. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。