查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- A Comparison between Interlocking Intramedullary Nailing with and without Reaming for the Treatment of Closed Unstable Tibial Shaft Fractures: A Prospective, Randomized Study
- 骨折癒合
- 中藥方劑土鼈蟲和萬靈膏對骨折癒合療效的研究
- 如意金黃散與接骨散對大白鼠脛骨骨折癒合過程中骨痂及骨組織中微量元素的影響
- Primary Reamed Intramedullary Nailing of Closed Femoral Shaft Fractures
- Failure of the Gamma Nail after Fracture Union--A Case Report
- Anterior Knee Pain after Intramedullary Tibial Nailing
- 鎖定式骨髓內釘
- Effects of Prostaglandin E[feaf]on Bone Fracture Healing Enhanced by Capacitively Coupled Electric Field and Pulsed Electromagnetic Field
- Reverse Drilling Technique in Inserting Distal Locking Screws of Interlocking Nail
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | A Comparison between Interlocking Intramedullary Nailing with and without Reaming for the Treatment of Closed Unstable Tibial Shaft Fractures: A Prospective, Randomized Study=骨髓腔擴鑽與否在互鎖式髓內釘治療閉鎖性不穩定脛骨幹骨折之比較 |
---|---|
作 者 | 林希鼎; 陳清安; 鄭正文; 梁福民; 王拔群; 沈博文; 陳雅惠; | 書刊名 | 輔仁醫學期刊 |
卷 期 | 4:4 民95.12 |
頁 次 | 頁167-176 |
分類號 | 416.26 |
關鍵詞 | 脛骨幹骨折; 骨髓腔擴鑽; 髓內釘; 骨折癒合; Tibial fractures; Intramedullary reaming; Intramedullary nailing; Fracture healing; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 背景和目的:雖然骨髓腔擴鑽用於互鎖式髓內釘治療,在臨床上已被報導有良好之成效,然而互鎖式髓內釘治療是否必須使用骨髓腔擴鑽仍是個疑問。本研究目的是探討骨髓腔擴鑽與否在使用互鎖式髓內釘治療閉鎖性不穩定脛骨幹骨折時,其結果是否有所差異。方法:以前瞻性、隨機性、比較性方法進行,研究對象為53 位在2002年7 月1 日至2004 年12 月31 日有閉鎖性不穩定脛骨幹骨折並接受髓內釘治療之病患,以癒合時間、型態、併發症及二次手術治療為主要之測量結果。結果:全體病患之平均骨折癒合時間為21 週(11~50 週),在擴鑽組平均癒合時間為19 週,而沒有擴鑽之平均癒合時間則為23 週;手術時間、術間失血量、術後併發率、二次手術、植入失敗結果在擴鑽與否兩組皆無統計上顯著差異。併發症在近側與末端骨折發生較頻繁(p =0.003);粉碎性骨折為影響癒合時間之重要因素(p = 0.037),而嵌入釘較大則會因增加骨與植入表面之接觸而穩定性較高使骨頭更為強化(s = -2.48, p < 0.001)。結論:對於單一或者嵌入的中間三節脛骨幹骨折,骨髓腔擴鑽在擴鑽與否兩組都有令人滿意的結果,但是在治療近側與末端之高度粉碎性脛骨幹骨折,擴鑽道越大容納直徑較長之嵌入釘可使骨折癒合較容易。 |
英文摘要 | Background and Purpose: Although reamed interlocking nailing has been reported to show good clinical results, the introduction of stronger interlocking nails that can be inserted without reaming has raised questions as to whether intramedullary reaming is necessary. The objectives of this study were to determine if any differences in outcomes exist between reamed and unreamed closed interlocking nailing in patients with unstable closed tibial shaft fractures. Methods: The study was conducted in a prospective, randomized, and comparative manner. Between July 1, 2002, and December 31, 2004, fifty three consecutive patients with unstable closed tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nail insertion with or without medullary canal reaming were included in the study. Time to fracture healing, the type and incidence of complications, and the number of secondary procedures performed to obtain union were the main outcome measurements. Results: The overall average fracture healing time was 21 (range, 11-50) weeks. In the reamed group, the fractures healed in an average of 19 weeks, while in the unreamed group, it took an average of 23 weeks. Differences in operative time, perioperative blood loss, the complication rate, the number of secondary procedures, and implant failure between the reamed and unreamed groups were not statistically significant. Complications developed more frequently with proximal and distal fractures (p=0.003). Comminution of the fracture itself was an important factor in fracture healing (p=0.037), and insertion of a larger diameter nail may have promoted bone consolidation by virtue of the increased stability achieved by the increased contact area between the implant and the bone surface (s=-2.48, p<0.001). Conclusions: For simple or wedged mid third tibia shaft fractures, interlocking intramedullary nailing, regardless of whether reaming is carried out, may produce satisfactory results. But for treating highly comminuted proximal or distal tibial shaft fractures, intramedullary reaming of the canal to accommodate larger diameter nails may facifitate fracture union. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。