查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 動靜態熱身對測功儀成績影響之研究=The Effect Study of Active and Static Warm-up on Rowing Ergometer Performance |
---|---|
作者 | 龔泰源; 劉于詮; 黃泰源; |
期刊 | 長榮運動休閒學刊 |
出版日期 | 20130600 |
卷期 | 7 2013.06[民102.06] |
頁次 | 頁19-28 |
分類號 | 528.9012 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 動態熱身; 靜態伸展; 測功儀; 划船; Active warm-up; Static stretching; Rowing ergometer; Rowing; |
中文摘要 | 目的:探討動態熱身和靜態伸展介入對2000m划船測功儀成績之影響。受試者:以台南市立土城高中9名男性划船選手為受測對象,年齡16.67±0.7歲、身高174.89±2.93公分、體重69.32±6.24公斤,所有選手均是受過訓練2年以上的選手。方法:所有受測者均參與兩個階段的實驗,此兩個實驗將介入不同的熱身方式,兩項測驗間隔一個星期。所得資料以相依樣本t檢定進行統計分析。結果:(一)動態熱身介入後的2000m測功儀成績419.22±11.99秒顯著優於靜態伸展介入後的2000m測功儀成績425.89±9.42秒(p<.05)。(二)動態熱身介入後的2000m測功儀槳頻30.22±1.64次/分鐘優於靜態伸展介入後的2000m測功儀槳頻29.66±1.87次/分鐘;但數據未達顯著差異。(三)動態熱身介入後的2000m測功儀平均功率305.11±25.943瓦特顯著優於靜態伸展介入後的2000m測功儀平均功率291.44±19.33瓦特(p<.05)。(四)動態熱身介入後的2000m測功儀消耗熱量1347.77±88.72卡顯著優於靜態伸展介入後的2000m測功儀消耗熱量1296.44±63.65卡(p<.05)。結論與建議:動態熱身是可以提升2000m划船測功儀的運動表現成績,因此在測驗2000m測功儀運動表現以動態熱身的方式較佳。另外,在後續研究中可增加至多種不同熱身方式介入進行數據比較,以更為詳細的了解不同熱身方式對於2000m測功儀成績之影響。 |
英文摘要 | Purpose: discussed the effect of intervention of active warm-up and static stretching on the performance of 2000m rowing ergometer performance. Subjects: 9 male rowing players from Tainan Municipal Tucheng High School were recruited as subjects. Average age was 16.67±0.7 years. Average height was 174.89±2.93 cm. Average weight was 69.3 2±6.24 kg. All subjects were the players accept training over two years. Methodology: all subjects joined two different stage experiments. In these experiments, different manners of warm-up were interfered. The interval was one week between the tests of these two experiments. All data were analyzed by dependent samples t-test. Results: (1) 2000m rowing ergometer performance (419.22±11.99 seconds) after the intervention of active warm-up was better significantly than the 2000m rowing ergometer performance (425.89±9.42seconds) after the intervention of static stretching (p<.05). (2) 2000m rowing ergometer paddling frequency (30.22±1.64times/min) after was better than the 2000m rowing ergometer paddling frequency (29.66±1.87times/min), but these data weren't different significantly. (3) 2000m rowing ergometer mean power output (305.11±25.943Watts) after the intervention of active warm-up was better significantly than the 2000m rowing ergometer mean power output (291.44±19.33 Watts) after the intervention of static stretching (p<.05). (4) 2000m rowing ergometer consuming calories (1 347.77±88.72calories) after the intervention of active warm-up was better significantly than the 2000m rowing ergometer consuming calories (1 296.44±63.65 calories) after the intervention of static stretching (p<.05). Conclusions and suggestions: active warm-up was better to do before the test of 2000m rowing due to active warm-up could promote the performance of 2000m rowing. On the side of future study, different warm-up interventions could be executed to understand effects of these warm-up interventions. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。