查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 由裁判理論的觀點析論United States v. American Library Association=U.S. v. American Library Association: A Critical Analysis Based on the Theory of Adjudication |
---|---|
作者 | 陳起行; Chen, Chi-shing; |
期刊 | 政大法學評論 |
出版日期 | 20070400 |
卷期 | 96 2007.04[民96.04] |
頁次 | 頁1-55 |
分類號 | 580.1654 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 裁判理論; 德渥金; 哈伯瑪斯; 情色資訊; 網際網路; 圖書館; 軟體過濾器; Theory of adjudication; Dworkin; Habermas; Pornography; Internet; Library; Software filters; |
中文摘要 | 繼一九九七年美國聯邦最高法院判決通訊潔淨法違憲之後,二○○三年美國聯邦最高法院在US v. ALA一案中,再度面臨兒童網際網路保護法是否違反成年人表意自由而違憲的爭訟。該法要求受聯邦電腦及網路經費補助的公共圖書館必須加裝軟體過濾器,避免兒童或少年接觸情色資訊。本文論述此一判決的事實、法律爭點及判決理由,並在簡介裁判理論上一系列的辯論後,以哈伯瑪斯批判德渥金的裁判理論為基礎,剖析US v. ALA多數意見之不當。 |
英文摘要 | US v. ALA is yet another decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that concerns the issue of indecent information on the Internet and the protection of minors, after the invalidation of the Communication Decency Act for its infringement on the right of freedom of expression of adults by the same court. The issue of US v. ALA involves yet another freedom of expression dispute regarding the Children's Internet Protection Act which requires all public libraries receiving federal funds for Internet connections to install software filters to prevent minors from gaining access to indecent material from the Internet. This article first describes the facts, issues and opinions of US v. ALA, and after introducing a series of debates on the theory of adjudication, the article argues that the majority opinions are inadequate based on Habermas' critique of Dworkin's theory of adjudication. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。